Analysis of The Global Posture of College Students With Chronic Neck Pain

Background: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is common, but methods that focus on the cervical spine have not met the patients' medical expectations.Objective: To investigate the global postural difference between students with CNP and healthy people.Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: Twenty-seven healthy college students without neck pain and 31 students with CNP were recruited and allocated into a control group and a CNP group. Differences in standing postural indicators between the two groups were compared.Results: Compared to the control group, the leg length discrepancy and the right rearfoot angle were larger and the anterior lower limb alignment angle was smaller. In the sagittal plane, the left sagittal lower limb alignment and right cervical alignment angles were larger, while the left and right sagittal body alignment angles in the CNP group were smaller. The odds ratio calculation for the trunk forward lean, right foot valgus, and knee flexion on both sides indicated that these are risk factors for CNP, while knee varus is not a risk factor for CNP. The remaining abnormal postures were shown not to be associated with CNP.Limitation: This study did not conduct in-depth research on the physiological state of the muscles, joints, and other structures, and we did not apply these theories to practice.Conclusions: Abnormal posture in students with CNP is mainly concentrated in the sagittal plane. Trunk forward lean, foot valgus, and knee flexion on both sides are risk factors for CNP.

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment measurement in mal-aligned knees

Purpose Long-leg-radiography (LLR) is commonly used for the measurement of lower limb alignment. However, limb rotations during radiography may interfere with the alignment measurement. This study examines the effect of limb rotation on the accuracy of measurements based on the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur and tibia, with variations in knee flexion and coronal deformity. Methods Forty-five lower limbs of 30 patients were scanned with CT. Virtual LLRs simulating five rotational positions (neutral, ± 10$$^{\circ }$$ ∘ , and ± 20$$^{\circ }$$ ∘ internal rotation) were generated from the CT images. Changes in the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA) and the femorotibial angle (FTA) were measured on each image with respect to neutral values. These changes were related to knee flexion and coronal deformity under both weight- and non-weight-bearing conditions. Results The measurement errors of the HKA and FTA derived from limb rotation were up to 4.84 ± 0.66$$^{\circ }$$ ∘ and 7.35 ± 0.88$$^{\circ }$$ ∘ , respectively, and were correlated with knee flexion (p < 0.001) and severe coronal deformity (p < 0.001). Compared with the non-weight-bearing position, the coronal deformity measured in the weight-bearing condition was 2.62$$^{\circ }$$ ∘ greater, the correlation coefficients between the coronal deformity and the deviation ranges of HKA and FTA were also greater. Conclusions Flexion and severe coronal deformity have a significant influence on the measurement error of lower limb alignment. Errors can be amplified in the weight-bearing condition compared with the non-weight-bearing condition. When using HKA and FTA to represent the mechanical axis and the anatomical axis on LLR, limb rotation impacts the anatomic axis more than the mechanical axis in patients with severe deformities. Considering LLR as the gold standard image modality, attention should be paid to the measurement of knee alignment. Especially for the possible errors derived from weight-bearing long-leg radiographs of patients with severe knee deformities.

Effects of task and hip-abductor fatigue on lower limb alignment and muscle activation

Purpose Fatigue-induced hip-abductor weakness may exacerbate lower-limb misalignments during different dynamic single-leg tasks. We sought to evaluate the effects of fatigue and task on lower limb kinematics and muscle activation and to find associations between measurements obtained in two tasks. Methods One-group pretest–posttest design. Seventeen healthy adults (9 W) performed the single-leg squat (SLSQUAT) and the single-leg hop (SLHOP) before and after a hip-abduction fatigue protocol. Hip adduction, knee frontal plane projection angle (knee FPPA) and heel inversion displacement were measured during the eccentric phase of the SLSQUAT and the SLHOP, as well as activation of the gluteus medius (GMed), tensor fascia latae (TFL), peroneus longus (PER) and tibialis anterior (TA). Moments and tasks were compared using a repeated-measures two-way ANOVA. Correlation between tasks was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation. Results No differences in kinematics or activation were found between moments. Hip-adduction displacement (P = 0.005), GMed (P = 0.008) and PER (P = 0.037) activation were higher during SLSQUAT, while TA activation was higher during SLHOP (P < 0.001). No differences were found between tasks in knee FPPA and heel inversion. Hip-adduction and knee FPPA were not correlated between tasks, while ankle inversion displacement was positively correlated (rs = 0.524–0.746). Conclusion Different characteristics of SLSQUAT (slower and deeper) seem to have led to increased hip adduction displacement, GMed, and PER activation and decreased TA activation, likely due to higher balance requirements. However, hip-abductor fatigue didn’t influence lower-limb alignment during the tasks. Finally, evaluations should be performed with different single-leg tasks since they don’t give the same lower-limb alignment information.

Osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic patients show comparable coronal knee joint line orientations in a cross-sectional study based on 3D reconstructed CT images

Purpose Recently introduced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment strategies aim to restore the pre-arthritic alignment of an individual patient. The native alignment of a patient can only be restored with detailed knowledge about the native and osteoarthritic alignment as well as differences between them. The first aim of this study was to assess the alignment of a large series of osteoarthritic (OA) knees and investigate whether femoral and tibial joint lines vary within patients with the same overall lower limb alignment. The secondary aim was to compare the alignment of OA patients to the previously published data of non-OA patients. This information could be useful for surgeons considering implementing one of the new alignment concepts. Material Coronal alignment parameters of 2692 knee OA patients were measured based on 3D reconstructed CT data using a validated planning software (Knee-PLAN®, Symbios, Yverdon les Bains, Switzerland). Based on these measurements, patients' coronal alignment was phenotyped according to the functional knee phenotype concept. These phenotypes represent an alignment variation of either the overall alignment, the femoral joint line orientation or the tibial joint line orientation. Each phenotype is defined by a specific mean and covers a range of ± 1.5° from this mean. Mean values and distribution among the phenotypes are presented and compared between two populations (OA patients of this study and non-OA patients of a previously published study) as well as between HKA subgroups (varus, valgus and neutral) using t tests and Chi-square tests (p < 0.05). Results Femoral and tibial joint lines varied within patients with the same overall lower limb alignment. A total of 162 functional knee phenotypes were found (119 males, 136 females and 94 mutual phenotypes). Mean values differed between the OA and non-OA population, but differences were small (< 2°) except for the overall alignment (e.g. HKA). The distribution of OA and non-OA patients among the phenotypes differed significantly, especially among the limb phenotypes. Conclusion Differences between OA and non-OA knees are small regarding coronal femoral and tibial joint line orientation. Femoral and tibial joint line orientation of osteoarthritic patients can, therefore, be used to estimate their native coronal alignment and plan an individualized knee alignment. Level of clinical evidence III.

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment measurement in mal-aligned knees

PurposeLong-leg-radiography (LLR) is commonly used for measurement of lower limb alignment. However, limb rotations during radiography may interfere with the alignment measurement. This study examines the effect of limb rotation on the accuracy of measurements based on the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur and tibia, with variations in knee flexion and coronal deformity. MethodsForty-five lower limbs of thirty patients were scanned with CT. Virtual LLRs simulating 5 rotational positions (neutral, ±10°, and ±20° internal rotation) were generated from the CT images. Changes in the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the femorotibial angle (FTA) were measured on each image with respect to neutral values. These changes were related to knee flexion and coronal deformity under both weight- and non-weight-bearing conditions. ResultsThe measurement error of the HKA and FTA derived from limb rotation were up to 4.84±0.66° and 7.35±0.88° respectively, and were correlated with knee flexion (p＜0.001) and severe coronal deformity (p≤0.001). Compared with non-weight-bearing position, coronal deformity measured in weight-bearing condition was 2.62° greater, the correlation coefficients between the coronal deformity and the deviation ranges of HKA and FTA were also greater. ConclusionFlexion and severe coronal deformity have significant influence on the measurement error of lower limb alignment. Errors can be amplified in the weight-bearing condition compared with the non-weight-bearing condition. The error of measurement of the anatomic axis is greater than the mechanical axis. Considering LLR is the gold standard image modality, attention should be paid to the measurement of knee alignment. Especially for the possible errors derives from weight-bearing long leg radiographs of patients with severe knee deformities.

Analysis of Gender Differences in the Rotational Alignment of the Distal Femur in Kinematically Aligned and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

To compare the angle between the external rotation references of the femoral components in the axial plane by gender and lower limb alignment in Korean patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 1273 patients were imported into a modeling software and segmented to develop three-dimensional femoral bony and cartilaginous models. The surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), posterior condylar axis (PCA), the kinematically aligned axis (KAA), and anteroposterior axis were used as rotational references in the axial plane for mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. The relationship among axes were investigated. Among 1273 patients, 942 were female and 331 were male. According to lower limb alignment, the varus and valgus knee groups comprised 848 and 425 patients, respectively. All measurements, except PCA-sTEA, differed significantly between men and women; all measurements, except PCA-sTEA, did not differ significantly between the varus and valgus knee groups. In elderly Korean patients with OA, rotational alignment of the distal femur showed gender differences, but no differences were seen according to lower limb alignment. The concern for malrotation of femoral components during kinematically aligned TKA is less in Koreans than in Caucasians and relatively less in women than in men. In MA TKA, malrotation of the femoral components can be avoided by setting different rotational alignments for the genders.

Effects of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Coronal and Sagittal Whole-Body Alignments: Serial Assessments Using Whole-Body EOS

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of correcting lower limb alignment by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the spinopelvic alignment and to identify patients with difference in the knee joint between clinically measured passive motion and the actual standing posture. Methods: In this retrospective study, 101 patients who underwent TKA and whose serial whole-body EOS X-ray were available were included. The relationship of the knee and spinopelvic alignment was analyzed by evaluating the parameters of standing anterior-posterior and lateral whole-body EOS X-ray. The differences between postoperative passive motion and weight-bearing posture in the knee joint were assessed in both coronal and sagittal planes. Furthermore, the causes of such differences were analyzed. Results: Significant correlations between Δpelvic obliquity and coronal ΔHip-Knee-Ankle (HKA)Rt-Lt angle between the preoperative and 3-month and 1-year postoperative data (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005, respectively) and improved with coronal lower limb alignment close to neutral resulted in decreased pelvic obliquity (p < 0.001, ß = 0.085 and p = 0.005, ß = 0.065, respectively) were observed. The correlations between Δpelvic tilt (PT) and Δsacral slope (SS) and sagittal ΔHKARt-Lt angle were statistically significant (PT: p < 0.001 and p < 0.045; SS: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The improved sagittal alignment close to neutral resulted in decreased PT and increased SS. The difference between postoperative passive motion and the weight-bearing posture of the knee joint was correlated with lumbar lordosis and sagittal C7 plumb line-sacrum distance (p = 0.042 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The correction of lower limb alignment with TKA affected pelvic parameters dominantly; however, there was little effect on the spinal alignment. Additionally, patients with anterior stooping or lumbar flat back demonstrated difference in extension between passive knee motion and standing. Therefore, rather than only focusing on changes in the knee alignment correction, knee surgeons should also evaluate the spinopelvic alignment before surgery to consider the prognosis of the standing and predict the possible changes in the whole-body alignment. This preoperative assessment may improve the prognosis of TKA.