Electrical Stimulation of Anal Sphincter or Pudendal Nerve Improves Anal Sphincter Pressure

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1284-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margot S. Damaser ◽  
Levilester Salcedo ◽  
Guangjian Wang ◽  
Paul Zaszczurynski ◽  
Michelle A. Cruz ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl F. Kothbauer ◽  
Klaus Novak

Object Intraoperative neurophysiological recording techniques have found increasing use in neurosurgical practice. The development of new recording techniques feasible while the patient receives a general anesthetic have improved their practical use in a similar way to the use of digital recording, documentation, and video technology. This review intends to provide an update on the techniques used and their validity. Methods Two principal methods are used for intraoperative neurophysiological testing during tethered cord release. Mapping identifies functional neural structures, namely nerve roots, and monitoring provides continuous information on the functional integrity of motor and sensory pathways as well as reflex circuitry. Mapping is performed mostly by using direct electrical stimulation of a structure within the surgical field and recording at a distant site, usually a muscle. Sensory mapping can also be performed with peripheral stimulation and recording within the surgical site. Monitoring of the motor system is achieved with motor evoked potentials. These are evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation and recorded from limb muscles and the external anal sphincter. The presence or absence of muscle responses are the parameters monitored. Sensory potentials evoked by tibial or pudendal nerve stimulation and recorded from the dorsal columns via an epidurally inserted electrode and/or from the scalp as cortical responses are used to access the integrity of sensory pathways. Amplitudes and latencies of these responses are then interpreted. The bulbocavernosus reflex, with stimulation of the pudendal nerve and recording of muscle responses in the external anal sphincter, is used for continuous monitoring of the reflex circuitry. Presence or absence of this response is the pertinent parameter that is monitored. Conclusions Intraoperative neurophysiology provides a wide and reliable set of techniques for intraoperative identification of neural structures and continuous monitoring of their functional integrity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Attari ◽  
William D. Chey ◽  
Jason R. Baker ◽  
James A. Ashton-Miller

AbstractThere is a need for a lower cost manometry system for assessing anorectal function in primary and secondary care settings. We developed an index finger-based system (termed “digital manometry”) and tested it in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation, and fecal incontinence. Anorectal pressures were measured in 16 participants with the digital manometry system and a 23-channel high-resolution anorectal manometry system. The results were compared using a Bland-Altman analysis at rest as well as during maximum squeeze and simulated defecation maneuvers. Myoelectric activity of the puborectalis muscle was also quantified simultaneously using the digital manometry system. The limits of agreement between the two methods were −7.1 ± 25.7 mmHg for anal sphincter resting pressure, 0.4 ± 23.0 mmHg for the anal sphincter pressure change during simulated defecation, −37.6 ± 50.9 mmHg for rectal pressure changes during simulated defecation, and −20.6 ± 172.6 mmHg for anal sphincter pressure during the maximum squeeze maneuver. The change in the puborectalis myoelectric activity was proportional to the anal sphincter pressure increment during a maximum squeeze maneuver (slope = 0.6, R2 = 0.4). Digital manometry provided a similar evaluation of anorectal pressures and puborectalis myoelectric activity at an order of magnitude less cost than high-resolution manometry, and with a similar level of patient comfort. Digital Manometry provides a simple, inexpensive, point of service means of assessing anorectal function in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dachling Pang ◽  
Kenneth Casey

Abstract The distinction of sacral roots and conus medullaris from lipoma, fibrous adhesions, and an abnormally thickened filum terminale can be difficult during operations on certain complicated dysraphic lesions. We describe a simple, noninvasive method of monitoring external anal sphincter “squeeze pressure” by means of an elongated, fluid-filled, polyethylene anal balloon connected to a pressure transducer. Cutaneous electrocardiographic (ECG) leads on both hips register the stimulus artifact from a monopolar nerve stimulator. The simultaneous display on the oscilloscope screen of the stimulus artifact and the resultant pressure response form an electromechanical coupling that allows the operator to identify a faulty stimulator probe and to distinguish true stimulus-induced external anal sphincter activity from spontaneous rhythmic contractions of the internal anal sphincter. Unilateral stimulation of the S-2, S-3, and S-4 roots generates tall pressure spikes between 40 and 75 torr in peak amplitudes, whereas S-1 and L-5 stimulation produces a stimulus artifact on the ECG but either no pressure response or a mere “ripple wave” of less than 7 torr. During operations on 11 patients with various dysraphic lesions, the S-2, S-3, and S-4 roots were identified easily and preserved, and the caudal extent of functioning neurons was localized within coni grossly distorted by intramedullary lipoma or chronic tethering. We prefer the anal sphincter pressure monitor to anal sphincter electromyography because of its simplicity, the inexpensive equipment, and its noise-free display that is virtually unaffected by other electronic systems in the operating room.


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W Boggs ◽  
Brian J Wenzel ◽  
Kenneth J Gustafson ◽  
Warren M Grill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document