scholarly journals Continuous haemodynamic effects of left tilting and supine positions during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with a noninvasive cardiac output monitor system

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-En Tsai ◽  
Pin H. Yeh ◽  
Po K. Hsu ◽  
Shao L. Tsao ◽  
Yu-Jun Chang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-60
Author(s):  
Ritu Pradhan ◽  
Sangeeta Shrestha ◽  
Tara Gurung ◽  
Amirbabu Shrestha

Aims: This study aims to review the haemodynamic effects of the repeat spinal anaesthesia and to identify the different doses of Bupivacaine heavy used for the repeat spinal anaesthesia for the failed spinal in caesarean section.Methods: This study was conducted by reviewing medical anaesthesia records of the cases of the repeat spinal anesthesia regarding any adverse haemodynamic effects. The second dose of bupivacaine heavy, maximum sensory blockade and intraoperative events like bradycardia, hypotension, high spinal, nausea vomiting, conversion to general anaesthesia and inadequate block were also reviewed.Results: Out of 8040 caesarean section under subarachnoid block, 51(0.63%) cases were conducted under repeat spinal anaesthesia from April 2014 to December2016. All the cases had complete spinal failure with no sensory and motor effects even after 10 minutes of the intrathecal injection. The second dose of bupivacaine heavy used was variable but reduced than the first dose. The most common adverse effect was hypotension (27.5%). 50% of cases were uneventful. One case was converted to general anaesthesia even after repeat spinal anaesthesia and 9.8% cases had high spinal above T4.Conclusions: Repeat administration of Bupivacaine heavy in reduced dose and volume can be used in complete failure of administration of first spinal anaesthesia. However, it always requires careful assessment and the judicious monitoring.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Kazumasu Sasaki ◽  
Tatsushi Mutoh ◽  
Tomoko Mutoh ◽  
Yasuyuki Taki ◽  
Tatsuya Ishikawa

Author(s):  
Kinichi Shibutani ◽  
Seisaku Sakata ◽  
Shuichi Shirasaki ◽  
Peter Ferlazzo ◽  
Mosses Bairamian

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1462-1462
Author(s):  
Johnny S. Yem ◽  
Yongquan Tang ◽  
Martin J. Turner ◽  
A. Barry Baker

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Sabharwal ◽  
G.S. Umamaheswara Rao ◽  
Zulfiqar Ali ◽  
Muthuchellappan Radhakrishnan

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Botte ◽  
Francis Leclerc ◽  
Yvon Riou ◽  
Ahmed Sadik ◽  
V??ronique Neve ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivar Nagelgaard Omenås ◽  
Christian Tronstad ◽  
Leiv Arne Rosseland

Abstract Background: In women presenting for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia, continuous measurement of circulatory aspects, such as blood pressure and cardiac output, is often needed. At present, invasive techniques are used almost exclusively. Reliable non-invasive monitors would be welcome, as they could be safer and less uncomfortable, while easy and quick to apply. We aimed to evaluate whether a non-invasive, finger plethysmographic device, the ccNexFin monitor, can replace invasively measured blood pressure in the radial artery, and whether cardiac output measurements from this device can be used interchangeably with measurements from the mini-invasive LiDCO monitor, currently in use at our institution. Methods: Simultaneous invasive measurements were compared with ccNexFin in 23 healthy women during elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. We used Bland Altman statistics for assessing agreement, and polar plot methodology for judging trending abilities with pre-defined limits. Results: Mean arterial and systolic pressures showed biases (invasive – ccNexFin) of -4.3 and 12.2 mmHg, with limits of agreement of -15.9 – 7.4 and -11.1 – 35.6, respectively. The ccNexFin trending abilities were within suggested limits for mean pressure, but insufficient for systolic pressure compared with invasive measurements. Cardiac output had a small bias of 0.2 L/min, but wide limits of agreement of -2.6 – 3.0. The ccNexFin trending abilities compared with the invasive estimated values (LiDCO) were unsatisfactory. Conclusions: We consider the ccNexFin monitor to have sufficient accuracy in measuring mean arterial pressures. The limits of agreement for systolic measurements were wider, and the trending ability, compared with invasive measurements, was outside the recommended limit. The ccNexFin is not reliable for cardiac output measurements or trend in pregnant women for caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document