Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate using iohexol plasma clearance in critically ill patients with augmented renal creatinine clearance

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Magalie Collet ◽  
Dany Hijazi ◽  
Pauline Sevrain ◽  
Romain Barthélémy ◽  
Marc-Antoine Labeyrie ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1544-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane M. Erley ◽  
Birgit D. Bader ◽  
Elke D. Berger ◽  
Anika Vochazer ◽  
Jork J. Jorzik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Hasan M. Al-Dorzi ◽  
Abdulmajeed A. Alsadhan ◽  
Ayman S. Almozaini ◽  
Ali M Alamri ◽  
Hani Tamim ◽  
...  

The performance of glomerular filtration rate- (GFR-) estimating equations was studied against creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine collection (CrCl24h-urine) in critically ill patients. Methods. In this substudy of the PermiT trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ISRCTN68144998), patients from King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh who had CrCl24h-urine were included. We estimated GFR using Cockroft–Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease study (MDRD), chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Jelliffe equations. For the CG equation, we entered the actual weight in one calculation (CGactual-wt), and if BMI ≥30 kg/m2, we entered the ideal body weight (CGideal-wt) and the adjusted body weight (CGadjusted-wt) in two calculations. We calculated the MDRD equation based on 4 (MDRD-4) and 6 variables (MDRD-6). The performance of these equations was assessed by different ways including Spearman correlation, bias (difference between estimated GFR and CrCl24h-urine), precision (standard deviation of bias), and Bland–Altman plot analysis. Results. The cohort consisted of 237 patients (age 45 ± 20 years, males 75%, mechanically ventilated 99% with serum creatinine 101 ± 94 µmol/L and CrCl24h-urine 108 ± 69 ml/min/1.73 m2). The correlations between the different equations and CrCl24h-urine were modest (r: 0.62 to 0.79; p < 0.0001 ). Bias was statistically significant for CGactual-wt (21 ml/min), CGadjusted-wt (12 ml/min), and MDRD-6 (-10 ml/min) equations. Precision ranged from 46 to 54 ml/min. The sensitivity of equations to correctly classify CrCl24h-urine 30–59.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 was 17.2% for CGactual-wt, 30.0% for CGideal-wt, 31.0% for CGadjusted-wt, 31.0% for MDRD-4, 39.1% for MDRD-6, 13.8% for CKD-EPI, and 34.5% for Jelliffe equation. Conclusions. Commonly used GFR-estimating equations had limited ability to properly estimate CrCl24h-urine and to correctly classify GFR into clinically relevant ranges that usually determine dosing of medications.


Nephron ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola Carrara ◽  
Nadia Azzollini ◽  
Giovanni Nattino ◽  
Daniela Corna ◽  
Sebastian Villa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document