SAFETY OF TRANSFOVEAL SUBTHRESHOLD DIODE MICROPULSE LASER FOR FOVEA-INVOLVING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN EYES WITH GOOD VISUAL ACUITY

Retina ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2010-2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey K. Luttrull ◽  
Stephen H. Sinclair
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142097911
Author(s):  
Diego Alejandro Valera-Cornejo ◽  
Marlon García-Roa ◽  
Jaime Quiroz-Mendoza ◽  
Alejandro Arias-Gómez ◽  
Paulina Ramírez-Neria ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to describe visual and anatomic outcomes of 5774nm micropulse laser photocoagulation in eyes with either treatment-naïve or refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) at 3 months. Methods: This was a prospective case series that recruited 23 consecutive patients (33 eyes) with center-involved DME that was either treatment-naïve or had not responded to prior treatment. Micropulse therapy was performed with the Easy Ret 577 (Quantel Medical, Cournon d’Auvergne, France) diode laser in a high-density manner in eyes with treatment-naïve or refractory DME. The primary outcome was the change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logMAR) at 1 and 3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in the central macular thickness (CMT), thickness area, macular volume, and macular capillary leakage at 1 and 3 months. Results: There were no significant changes in BCVA at 3 months, with mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −0.08 ± 0.01 ( p = 0.228) and + 0.01 ± 0.01 ( p = 0.969) for treatment-naïve and refractory groups, respectively. The change in CMT at 3 months was statistically but not clinically significant in the treatment-naïve group only (mean ± SD; –30 ± 130 µm; p = 0.011). The macular volume and area thickness change were not statistically significant ( p = 0.173 and p = 0.148 for macular volume and area thickness, respectively) in the treatment-naïve group. There was no difference concerning the leakage area in both groups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: We concluded that micropulse 577nm laser therapy maintained the visual acuity and macular thickness at 3 months in both treatment-naïve and refractory DME.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Bıçak ◽  
Özcan Rasim Kayıkçıoğu ◽  
Muhammed Altınışık ◽  
Suzan Doğruya ◽  
Emin Kurt

Abstract Purpose: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the visual acuity, macular volume, central macular thickness, change in number of intravitreal ranibizumab injections with micropulse laser applications after loading dose of antiVEGF to DME patients.Study Design: Retrospective study Methods: This study was carried out on 97 patients (45 ranibizumab and 52 micropuls grid laser + ranibizumab) with diabetic macular edema patients who were followed in the Retina Unit. At the control visit after three loading ranibizumab injections administered once a month, micropuls grid laser was applied to one group and ranibizumab injection was continued PRN to both groups for an average of 9.27 ± 2.42 months and central macular thickness, macular volume and visual acuity were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of gender, smoking and systemic diseases, initial central macular thickness, macular volume and visual acuity measurements (p> 0.05). Central macular thickness, macular volume and visual acuity values measured at the last follow-up of the patients were not significantly different between the groups (p> 0.05). The mean post-treatment injection requirement was 4.19 ± 1.01 for the ranibizumab with micropuls laser group and 5.53 ± 1.14 for the ranibizumab group. In the group treated with micropuls laser, statistically less number of intravitreal ranibizumab injections were needed (p <0.001). Conclusion: Micropulse laser treatment after initial loading doses reduces the need for antiVEGF injections. Studies with the participation of more patients may help in the selection of treatment methods by comparing micropulse laser combined with different injection protocols.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 879-887
Author(s):  
Sidra Zafar ◽  
Kerry Smith ◽  
Michael V. Boland ◽  
Christina Y. Weng ◽  
Sharon Solomon ◽  
...  

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the main causes of a significant reduction in visual acuity in working-age adults and is the most common cause of visual acuity loss from diabetic retinopathy. Most of the studies have shown that the ability of the conventional laser to maintain or improve visual acuity is limited, possibly because of the development of retinal scars, which decrease the potential for improved visual acuity. Subthreshold laser and subliminal (micropulse) laser has the potential to reduce DME with better visual acuity results compared with conventional laser, as it does not cause collateral damage in the retina. These lasers cannot cause permanent damage to the retina. This article mentions subthreshold laser, and subliminal (micropulse) laser in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document