“TREAT AND EXTEND” DOSING OF INTRAVITREAL ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY FOR TYPE 3 NEOVASCULARIZATION/RETINAL ANGIOMATOUS PROLIFERATION

Retina ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1424-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL ENGELBERT ◽  
SANDRINE A. ZWEIFEL ◽  
K BAILEY FREUND
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation ◽  
Treat And Extend ◽  
Type 3 Neovascularization ◽  
Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Factor Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Therapy ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

scholarly journals Ten-year outcomes of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Eye ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1888-1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Chandra ◽  
Cristina Arpa ◽  
Deepthy Menon ◽  
Hagar Khalid ◽  
Robin Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Degeneration ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Factor Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Therapy ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Treatment of Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema That Had a Suboptimal Response to Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: 2-mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide vs 0.7-mg Dexamethasone Implant

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-376
Author(s):  
Brandon Kuley ◽  
Philip P. Storey ◽  
Maitri Pancholy ◽  
Turner D. Wibbelsman ◽  
Anthony Obeid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Factor Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Therapy ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: This article compares 2-mg intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) and 0.7-mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in eyes that had a suboptimal response to antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Methods: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted of patients receiving either IVT between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2018, or patients receiving DEX between October 1, 2015, and January 1, 2018. Visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at visit of first injection and all subsequent visits. Results: Twenty-five eyes were included in the DEX group and 32 eyes were included in the IVT group. Change in vision from baseline was similar between DEX and IVT at 6-month follow-up (1.1 lines vs 2.3 lines, respectively; P = .24). Mean decrease in CMT from baseline was not different at 6-month follow-up (DEX: 120 µm vs IVT: 185 µm; P = .17). Conclusions: DEX and 2-mg IVT both achieved improvement in vision and CMT with no significant differences between treatment groups at 6-month follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document