Court Decisions on Medical Malpractice in China After the New Tort Liability Law

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-151
Author(s):  
Kui Zhang ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Fei Fan ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Zhen-hua Deng
Author(s):  
Karl Harald Søvig ◽  
Barry Furrow

This chapter presents a comparison of liability/compensation systems across countries, which can be challenging because of substantial differences in tort doctrine, judicial systems, and administrative compensation mechanisms. It approaches the problem of patient injury in a healthcare system from the dual (and dueling) perspectives of system responsibility and provider culpability. The basic question that the chapter asks is this: Who should bear the economic costs of medical adverse events? The US system remains solidly anchored in the tort liability system, with its emphasis on negligence-based culpability in medical malpractice cases—but with timid moves toward enterprise liability and statutory communication and resolution programs. By contrast, the Scandinavian systems have publicly funded patient compensation funds.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Koziol ◽  
Yan Zhu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document