Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flaps and Muscle-Sparing Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flaps for the Treatment of Axillary Hidradenitis

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shareef Jandali ◽  
Michael N. Mirzabeigi ◽  
Joshua Fosnot ◽  
David W. Low
2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Arikawa ◽  
Shimpei Miyamoto ◽  
Masahide Fujiki ◽  
Takuya Higashino ◽  
Azusa Oshima ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Jørn Bo Thomsen ◽  
Mikkel Børsen Rindom ◽  
Alberto Rancati ◽  
Claudio Angrigiani

Thoracodorsal artery (TDA) flaps, ranging from the vascular-pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, the propeller TDAP flap, and the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap to the conventional latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and the extended LD flap, can all be used for breast reconstruction. The aim of this paper and review is to share our experiences and recommendations for procedure selection when applying TDA-based flaps for breast reconstruction. We describe the different surgical techniques and our thoughts and experience regarding indications and selection between these procedures for individual patients who opt for breast reconstruction. We have performed 574 TDA flaps in 491 patients: 60 extended LD flaps, 122 conventional LD flaps, two MSLD flaps, 233 propeller TDAP flaps, 122 TDAP flaps, and 35 free contralateral TDAP flaps for stacked TDAP breast reconstruction. All the TDA flaps are important flaps for reconstruction of the breast. The LD flap is still an option, although we prefer flaps without muscle when possible. The vascular-pedicled TDAP flap is an option for experienced surgeons, and the propeller TDAP flap can be used in most reconstructive cases of the breast, although a secondary procedure is often necessary for correction of the pedicle bulk. The extended LD flap is an option for women with a substantial body mass index, although it is associated with the highest morbidity of all the TDA flaps. The MSLD flap can be used if the perforators are small or if dissection of the perforators is assessed to be hazardous.


Author(s):  
Marzia Salgarello ◽  
Giuseppe Visconti

Abstract Background Lateral thoracic flaps represent a precious source for partial and total breast reconstruction, in some cases as first option and in other cases as alternative of free flaps. This article describes the ultrasound (US)-based planning of the lateral thoracic wall perforator adipocutaneous flaps and it reports our experience on 52 consecutive flaps. Patients and Methods From November 2018 to May 2021, 52 consecutive lateral thoracic wall perforator flaps were performed using the US-based method for reconstruction of partial breast defects and total breast reconstruction. High-frequency US was performed in all cases prior to surgery to select the best perforator and design the flap. Results Of the 52 cases, 41 were lateral intercostal artery perforator flaps (78.8%), and 11 were thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps. Of the 11 TDAP flaps, 2 cases were based on the direct cutaneous branch. Moreover, in two other cases clinically scheduled for lateral thoracic perforator flaps due to the presence of an appropriate axillary roll, no suitable local/regional perforators were detected with the preoperative US examination and the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap was performed. Conclusion Preoperative planning of these flaps using US speeds the surgery and makes it easier and more efficient. Therefore, it is reasonable that the color duplex ultrasound is the operative surgeon's tool for mapping the lateral thoracic wall perforators and to appropriately plan each flap.


2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1524-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goo-Hyun Mun ◽  
Byeng-June Jeon ◽  
So-Young Lim ◽  
Won-Sok Hyon ◽  
Sa-Ik Bang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document