scholarly journals Thoracodorsal artery flaps for breast reconstruction–the variants and its approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Jørn Bo Thomsen ◽  
Mikkel Børsen Rindom ◽  
Alberto Rancati ◽  
Claudio Angrigiani

Thoracodorsal artery (TDA) flaps, ranging from the vascular-pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, the propeller TDAP flap, and the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap to the conventional latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and the extended LD flap, can all be used for breast reconstruction. The aim of this paper and review is to share our experiences and recommendations for procedure selection when applying TDA-based flaps for breast reconstruction. We describe the different surgical techniques and our thoughts and experience regarding indications and selection between these procedures for individual patients who opt for breast reconstruction. We have performed 574 TDA flaps in 491 patients: 60 extended LD flaps, 122 conventional LD flaps, two MSLD flaps, 233 propeller TDAP flaps, 122 TDAP flaps, and 35 free contralateral TDAP flaps for stacked TDAP breast reconstruction. All the TDA flaps are important flaps for reconstruction of the breast. The LD flap is still an option, although we prefer flaps without muscle when possible. The vascular-pedicled TDAP flap is an option for experienced surgeons, and the propeller TDAP flap can be used in most reconstructive cases of the breast, although a secondary procedure is often necessary for correction of the pedicle bulk. The extended LD flap is an option for women with a substantial body mass index, although it is associated with the highest morbidity of all the TDA flaps. The MSLD flap can be used if the perforators are small or if dissection of the perforators is assessed to be hazardous.


Author(s):  
L. Brambilla ◽  
P. Parisi ◽  
A. Gatto ◽  
D. Codazzi ◽  
N. Baronetto ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In breast surgery, an autologous flap combined with implant may reduce the risk or repair the soft-tissue defects in several cases. Traditionally, the preferred flap is the myocutaneous latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. In the perforator flap era, the evolution of LD flap is the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap. The aim of this study is the comparison between LD flap and TDAP flap with implants in terms of early complications and shoulder function. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. Between January 1 2015 and January 1 2020, 27 women underwent a unilateral total breast reconstruction with LD or TDAP flap combined with an implant at our institution. 15 women were operated with LD flap and 12 with TDAP flap. The most frequent indications for intervention were results of mastectomy and radiation-induced contracture. We evaluated several data in terms of clinical and demographical characteristics, operative and perioperative factors, and follow-up variables. We assessed shoulder function through the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Results The rate of complications was significantly lower in the TDAP group compared with the LD group (16.7% vs 60.0%, p = 0.047. Table 3). Although the small sample size limited further detailed statistical analyses, we particularly noticed no cases of donor site seroma in the TDAP group, as compared with four in the LD group. Patients in the TDAP group had an ∼11-point lower mean DASH score compared with the LD group (9.8 vs 20.5). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.049). Conclusions TDAP flap seems to be a reliable technique for soft-tissue coverage in total breast reconstruction with implants. In comparison with the traditional LD flap, it could be a more favorable option in terms of less complications and better quality of life.



2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustapha Hamdi ◽  
Marzia Salgarello ◽  
Liliana Barone-Adesi ◽  
Koenraad Van Landuyt


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Marchesi ◽  
Stefano Marcelli ◽  
Nicola Zingaretti ◽  
Pier Camillo Parodi ◽  
Luca Vaienti


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shareef Jandali ◽  
Michael N. Mirzabeigi ◽  
Joshua Fosnot ◽  
David W. Low


2019 ◽  
pp. 677-694
Author(s):  
Michael Klebuc ◽  
Elizabeth Killion ◽  
Jesse Selber ◽  
Gregory R. D. Evans

Latissimus dorsi muscle and myocutaneous flaps provide a versatile means of providing both implant-based and pure autologous breast reconstructions. The technique is well suited to lean patients and those with contraindications to the use of the lower abdomen as a donor site. The technique has been progressively refined over time to provide concealed scars and to reduce donor site morbidity. The use of endoscopic assistance, robotic flap harvest, muscle-sparing flap design, and perforator flaps based on the thoracodorsal vascular access (the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap or TAP-flap), continue to increase the utility of this donor site for breast reconstruction.



2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Jin An Cha ◽  
Sung Ho Yoon

For axillary reconstruction, most reconstructive surgeons use the latissimus dorsi flap because of its usefulness and reliability. However, the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap poses complications such as donor site morbidity and poor aesthetic results. Moreover, the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, without muscle, presents difficulties for the delicate procedure of dissecting the perforators separately. Therefore, we propose the use of a pedicled TDAP flap including a latissimus dorsi muscle strip for axillary reconstruction, as it is believed to be easier and safer to perform.



2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
Anna B. Lopez Ojeda ◽  
C. Carrasco Lopez ◽  
Tiago A. Gomes Rodrigues ◽  
J. Muñoz Vidal ◽  
C. Higueras Suñe ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document