Out-of-pocket Costs for Commercially-insured Patients in the Years Following Bariatric Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace F. Chao ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Jyothi R. Thumma ◽  
Karan R. Chhabra ◽  
David E. Arterburn ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S143
Author(s):  
Grace F. Chao ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Jyothi R. Thumma ◽  
Karan R. Chhabra ◽  
Dana A. Telem ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christopher J.D. Wallis ◽  
Daniel D. Joyce ◽  
Zachary Klaassen ◽  
Amy N. Luckenbaugh ◽  
Aaron A. Laviana ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e533-e546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiko Chino ◽  
Jeffrey M. Peppercorn ◽  
Christel Rushing ◽  
Jonathan Nicolla ◽  
Arif H. Kamal ◽  
...  

Purpose: Patients with cancer are at risk for substantial treatment-related costs; however, little is known about patients’ willingness to sacrifice to receive cancer care and how their attitudes and burden may change with time. Patients and Methods: We conducted a longitudinal survey of insured patients with solid tumor cancers receiving chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Patients were surveyed at two time points about their willingness to make financial sacrifices and their actual sacrifices, including out-of-pocket costs. Patient attitudes and sacrifices were compared over time. Results: Of 349 patients approached, 300 completed the baseline survey (86% response) and 245 completed the follow-up survey 3 months later (82% retention). Median patient-reported cancer-related out-of-pocket costs for patients who completed both surveys were $393 per month (range, $0 to $26,586 per month) at baseline and $328 per month (range, $0 to $8,210 per month) at follow-up. At baseline, 49% were willing to declare personal bankruptcy, 38% were willing to sell their homes, and ≥ 65% were willing to make other sacrifices, including borrowing money to afford their cancer care. Upon follow-up, there were minor decreases in willingness; the maximum net change was a 7% decline in patients willing to declare bankruptcy. Actual sacrifice increased over time; the greatest increase was in patients who used their savings (increased from 41% to 54%). Conclusion: A large proportion of insured patients with cancer were willing to make considerable personal and financial sacrifices to receive care; these attitudes did not change greatly over time. Shared decision making is important to ensure patients fully understand the goals, risks, and benefits of therapy before they make such personal sacrifices.


Obesity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Takemoto ◽  
Bruce M. Wolfe ◽  
Corey L. Nagel ◽  
Janne Boone‐Heinonen

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011278
Author(s):  
Chloe E. Hill ◽  
Evan L. Reynolds ◽  
James F. Burke ◽  
Mousumi Banerjee ◽  
Kevin A. Kerber ◽  
...  

Objective:To measure the out-of-pocket costs of evaluation and management (E/M) services and common diagnostic testing for neurology patients.Methods:Utilizing a large, privately-insured healthcare claims database, we identified patients with a neurologic visit or diagnostic test from 2001-2016 and assessed inflation-adjusted out-of-pocket costs for E/M visits, neuroimaging, and neurophysiologic testing. For each diagnostic service each year, we estimated the proportion of patients with out-of-pocket costs, the mean out-of-pocket cost, and the proportion of the total service cost paid out-of-pocket. We modeled out-of-pocket cost as a function of patient and insurance factors.Results:We identified 3,724,342 patients. The most frequent neurologic services were E/M visits (78.5%), electromyogram/nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS) (7.7%), MRIs (5.3%), and electroencephalograms (EEGs) (4.5%). Annually, 86.5-95.2% of patients paid out-of-pocket costs for E/M visits and 23.1-69.5% for diagnostic tests. For patients paying any out-of-pocket cost, the mean out-of-pocket cost increased over time, most substantially for EEG, MRI, and E/M. Out-of-pocket costs varied considerably; for an MRI in 2016, the 50th percentile paid $103.1 and the 95th percentile paid $875.4. The proportion of total service cost paid out-of-pocket increased. High deductible health plan (HDHP) enrollment was associated with higher out-of-pocket costs for MRI, EMG/NCS, and EEG.Conclusions:An increasing number of patients pay out-of-pocket for neurologic diagnostic services. These costs are rising and vary greatly across patients and tests. The cost sharing burden is particularly high for the growing population with HDHPs. In this setting, neurologic evaluation might result in financial hardship for patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietric L. Hennings ◽  
Maria Baimas-George ◽  
Zaid Al-Quarayshi ◽  
Rachel Moore ◽  
Emad Kandil ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 493-494
Author(s):  
Jared M. Whitson ◽  
G. Bennett Stackhouse ◽  
Marshall L. Stoller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document