Abstract
Aims
General surgery consultants have some of the highest rates of burnout. Ever increasing emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions playing a major role in this. A move to create split sub-speciality cover consisting of upper GI/HPB (UGI) and colorectal (CR) consultants has been suggested to improve EGS outcomes. We assessed the impact changing on-call working patterns had on perceived consultant stress levels, manageability of their workload and patient length of stay (LOS).
Methods
Consultant on call patterns changed from an individual consultant covering four consecutive weekdays to two consultants (one UGI/HPB, one CR) sharing four consecutive weekdays. Consultants were surveyed to assess the impact of this change on the manageability of their workload and their perceived stress levels. Admission numbers and LOS were also analysed for all EGS admissions over a 6-month period either side of the rota change.
Results
89% of consultants who responded chose to work the new on call format. 78% felt it had improved the manageability of their workload, decreased perceived stress levels and improved quality of patient care.
There was no change in the number of EGS admissions (862 vs 866) or EGS patient length over the time periods studied (Pre: 0D: 8%, 1 – 2D 38%, 3 – 4D 19%, >4D 34%. vs Post: 0D 8%, 1 – 2D 40%, 3 – 4D 17%, > 4D 35%).
Conclusions
A move to shorter and sub-specialty on call duties reduced stress and improved manageability for consultant general surgeons without adverse impact on patient’s length of stay.
Evaluating mortality outlier hospitals to improve the quality of care in emergency general surgery
