Use of High-Dose Ganciclovir for the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Replication in Solid Organ Transplant Patients With Ganciclovir Resistance-Inducing Mutations

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 1015-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Gracia-Ahufinger ◽  
Juan Gutiérrez-Aroca ◽  
Elisa Cordero ◽  
Elisa Vidal ◽  
Sara Cantisán ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah GiaQuinta ◽  
Marian G. Michaels ◽  
Jonathan A. McCullers ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Christopher Fonnesbeck ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 3458-3461 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.Ö. Eyüboğlu ◽  
E. Küpeli ◽  
Ş.S. Bozbaş ◽  
Z.E. Özen ◽  
E.S. Akkurt ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1898-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry T. Papaconstantinou ◽  
Bradford Sklow ◽  
Michael J. Hanaway ◽  
Thomas G. Gross ◽  
Thomas M. Beebe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Benamu ◽  
Cameron R. Wolfe ◽  
José G. Montoya

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret R. Jorgenson ◽  
Jillian L. Descourouez ◽  
Glen E. Leverson ◽  
Erin K. McCreary ◽  
Michael R. Lucey ◽  
...  

Background: Following abdominal solid organ transplant (aSOT), valganciclovir (VGC) is recommended for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis. This agent is associated with efficacy concerns, toxicity, and emergence of ganciclovir resistance. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of high-dose acyclovir (HD-A) prophylaxis failure in seropositive aSOT recipients (R+). Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study of R+ transplanted without lymphocyte-depleting induction between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2013, discharged with 3 months of HD-A prophylaxis (800 mg 4 times daily). The primary outcome was incidence of prophylaxis failure. Secondary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven tissue-invasive disease and prophylaxis failure for each allograft subgroup. Results: A total of 1525 patients met inclusion criteria: 944 renal (RTX), 108 simultaneous pancreas-kidneys (SPK), 462 liver (LTX), and 11 pancreas (PTX) transplant recipients. The composite rate of HD-A prophylaxis failure was 7%; incidence of tissue-invasive disease was 0.4%. Failure rates were 4.5%, 6.1%, 11%, and 20% in the RTX, SPK, LTX, and PTX populations, respectively; tissue-invasive disease rates were 0.2%, 0%, 0.7%, and 10%. Failure occurred more frequently in the LTX and PTX populations ( P < 0.0001, HR = 2.6; P = 0.04 HR = 4.4). Incidence of tissue-invasive disease was minimal and not different in the RTX, LTX and SPK populations ( P = 0.34). When evaluating recipients of seronegative allografts (D−), the composite failure rate was 3.4% with no significant difference between allograft subgroups ( P = 0.45). Conclusion: HD-A may be a reasonable prophylaxis alternative for D−/R+ recipients, in the absence of lymphocyte-depleting induction, if low incidence viremia is tolerable. Future studies are needed to determine the long-term impact of CMV viremia in the setting of this prophylaxis approach.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (4) ◽  
pp. A608
Author(s):  
Faisal Khateeb ◽  
Zaid Ammari ◽  
Aahd Kubbara ◽  
Yousef Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Fadi Safi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document