scholarly journals The CNOC2 field galaxy redshift survey

Author(s):  
R. G Carlberg ◽  
H. K. C. Yee ◽  
S. L. Morris ◽  
H. Lin ◽  
M. Sawicki ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 29002 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Sylos Labini ◽  
N. L. Vasilyev ◽  
Y. V. Baryshev

2004 ◽  
Vol 607 (2) ◽  
pp. 751-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Hoyle ◽  
Michael S. Vogeley

2002 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ø. Elgarøy ◽  
O. Lahav ◽  
W. J. Percival ◽  
J. A. Peacock ◽  
D. S. Madgwick ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Chuan Cai ◽  
Jun Pan ◽  
Yong-Heng Zhao ◽  
Long-Long Feng ◽  
Li-Zhi Fang ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 570 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Hoyle ◽  
Michael S. Vogeley ◽  
J. Richard Gott III

2005 ◽  
Vol 629 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia Diaz ◽  
Ariel Zandivarez ◽  
Manuel E. Merchan ◽  
Hernan Muriel

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 3033-3046 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIANBO LU ◽  
YABO WU ◽  
LIXIN XU

The kinematical model j(z) = j0and dynamical model wde(z) = w0, are constrained from the latest observational data: Union2 data including 557 type Ia supernovae (SNIa), 15 observational Hubble data (OHD), baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and Two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) and CMB data from seven-year WMAP. We get the current values of deceleration parameter q0, jerk parameter j0, dimensionless matter density Ωm, equation of state for dark energy w0and transition redshift zT. Furthermore, it is shown that for both kinematical and dynamical models, the constraint results support for the cosmic concordance model, ΛCDM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document