scholarly journals Curious and sublime: the connection between uncertainty and probability in physics

2011 ◽  
Vol 369 (1956) ◽  
pp. 4690-4704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey R. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Everett Interpretation

From its first significant appearance in physics, the notion of probability has been linked in the minds of physicists with the notion of uncertainty. But the link may prove to be tenuous, if quantum mechanics, construed in terms of the Everett interpretation, is anything to go by.

scholarly journals Probability, preclusion and biological evolution in Heisenberg-picture Everett quantum mechanics

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150117
Author(s):  
Mark A. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
State Vector ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Second Law Of Thermodynamics ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Second Law ◽  
Subjective Experiences ◽  
Everett Interpretation ◽  
Heisenberg Picture ◽  
Physical Laws

The fact that certain “extraordinary” probabilistic phenomena — in particular, macroscopic violations of the second law of thermodynamics — have never been observed to occur can be accounted for by taking hard preclusion as a basic physical law, i.e. precluding from existence events corresponding to very small but nonzero values of quantum-mechanical weight. This approach is not consistent with the usual ontology of the Everett interpretation, in which outcomes correspond to branches of the state vector, but can be successfully implemented using a Heisenberg-picture-based ontology in which outcomes are encoded in transformations of operators. Hard preclusion can provide an explanation for biological evolution, which can in turn explain our subjective experiences of, and reactions to, “ordinary” probabilistic phenomena, and the compatibility of those experiences and reactions with what we conventionally take to be objective probabilities arising from physical laws.

scholarly journals Branch-counting in the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics

2021 ◽  
Vol 477 (2255) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Quantum Probability ◽  
Objective Probability ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Many Worlds ◽  
Everett Interpretation ◽  
Counting Rule ◽  
Bose Einstein

A defence is offered of a version of the branch-counting rule in the Everett interpretation (otherwise known as many worlds interpretation) of quantum mechanics that both depends on the state and is continuous in the norm topology on Hilbert space. The well-known branch-counting rule, for realistic models of measurements, in which branches are defined by decoherence theory, fails this test. The new rule hinges on the use of decoherence theory in defining branching structure, and specifically decoherent histories theory. On this basis ratios of branch numbers are defined, free of any convention. They agree with the Born rule and deliver a notion of objective probability similar to naive frequentism, save that the frequencies of outcomes are not confined to a single world at different times, but spread over worlds at a single time. Nor is it ad hoc : it is recognizably akin to the combinatorial approach to thermodynamic probability, as introduced by Boltzmann in 1879. It is identical to the procedure followed by Planck, Bose, Einstein and Dirac in defining the equilibrium distribution of the Bose–Einstein gas. It also connects in a simple way with the decision-theory approach to quantum probability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document