scholarly journals Individuals with recurrent low back pain exhibit further altered trunk control in remission than when in pain

Author(s):  
Hai-Jung Steffi Shih ◽  
Linda Van Dillen ◽  
Jason Kutch ◽  
Kornelia Kulig

AbstractBackgroundMovement alterations due to low back pain (LBP) could lead to long-term adverse consequences if they do not resolve after symptom subsides. This study aims to determine if altered trunk control associated with recurrent low back pain persists beyond symptom duration.MethodsTwenty young adults with recurrent low back pain were tested once during an LBP episode and once in symptom remission, and twenty matched back-healthy participants served as controls. Participants walked on a treadmill with five prescribed step widths. Motion capture and surface electromyography were used to record frontal plane trunk kinematics and muscle activation. Thorax-pelvis coordination was calculated using vector coding technique, and bilateral longissimus activation and co-activation were analyzed.FindingsYoung adults with recurrent LBP exhibited a “looser” trunk control strategy in the frontal plane during gait that was persistent regardless of pain status across multiple step widths compared to back-healthy controls. This was demonstrated by a greater pelvis-only, less thorax-only coordination pattern, and decreased bilateral longissimus co-activation in individuals with recurrent LBP than controls. The looser trunk control strategy was further amplified when individuals with recurrent LBP were in symptom remission and exhibited greater trunk excursion and reduced in-phase coordination.InterpretationThe amplification of aberrant movement during symptom remission may suggest that movement patterns or anatomical factors existing prior to the tested painful episode underlie the altered trunk control in individuals with recurrent LBP. The symptom remission period of recurrent LBP patients may be a critical window into clinical evaluation and treatment.

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2152-2159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ege Johanson ◽  
Simon Brumagne ◽  
Lotte Janssens ◽  
Madelon Pijnenburg ◽  
Kurt Claeys ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1177-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Brumagne ◽  
Lotte Janssens ◽  
Stefanie Knapen ◽  
Kurt Claeys ◽  
Ege Suuden-Johanson

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1006-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Haddas ◽  
Yigal Samocha ◽  
James Yang

Study Design: Prospective, concurrent-cohort study. Objectives: To determine the effects of volitional preemptive abdominal contraction (VPAC) on trunk control during an asymmetric lift in patients with recurrent low back pain (rLBP) and compare with matched controls. Methods: Thirty-two rLBP patients and 37 healthy controls performed asymmetric lifting with and without VPAC. Trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanical along with neuromuscular activity parameters were obtained using 3-dimensional motion capture and electromyography system. Hypotheses were tested using analysis of variance. Results: The VPAC resulted in significantly reduced muscle activity across all trunk extensor muscles in both groups (M ± SD, 6.4% ± 8.2% of maximum contraction; P ≤ .005), and reduced trunk side flexion (1.4° ± 5.1° smaller; P ≤ .005) and hip abduction (8.1° ± 21.1° smaller; P ≤ .003). rLBP patients exhibited reduced muscle activity in external oblique (12.3% ± 5.5% of maximum contraction; P ≤ .012), as well as decreased hip flexion (4.7°, P ≤ .008) and hip abduction (5.2°, P ≤ .001) at the final position of lifting in comparison with healthy controls. Conclusions: The results of this study defend the recommendation that the use of a VPAC increase spine stability during an asymmetrical loading task. Our results provide an indication that a VPAC strategy that is achieved during an asymmetric lifting decreases exposure for lumbar spine injury and instability. Spine care providers and ergonomists can use this information when designing neuromuscular control training programs, both for healthy individuals aimed at prevention of injury, as well as those with a history of rLBP, aimed at full functional recovery and protection from future injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document