Dense cortical input to the rostromedial tegmental nucleus mediates aversive signaling

AbstractThe rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg) encodes negative reward prediction error (RPE) and plays an important role in guiding behavioral responding to aversive stimuli. While initial studies describing the RMTg revealed the presence of cortical afferents, the density and distribution of this input has not been explored in detail. In addition, the functional consequences of cortical modulation of RMTg signaling are only just beginning to be investigated. The current study anatomically and functionally characterizes cortical input to the RMTg in rats. Findings from this work reveal dense input spanning the entire medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) as well as the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insular cortex. Afferents were most dense in the dorsomedial subregion of the PFC (dmPFC), an area which has also been implicated in both RPE signaling and aversive responding. RMTg-projecting dmPFC neurons originate in layer V and collateralize extensively throughout the brain. In-situ mRNA hybridization further revealed that neurons in this circuit are predominantly D1 receptor-expressing with a high degree of D2 receptor colocalization. Optogenetic stimulation of dmPFC terminals in the RMTg drives avoidance, and cFos expression is enhanced in this neural circuit during exposure to aversive stimuli. Exposure to such aversive stimuli results in significant physiological and structural plasticity suggestive of a loss of top-down modulation of RMTg-mediated signaling. Altogether, these data reveal the presence of a prominent cortico-subcortical projection involved in adaptive behavioral responding and provide a foundation for future work aimed at exploring alterations in circuit function in diseases characterized by deficits in cognitive control over the balance between reward and aversion.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of The rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), a GABAergic afferent to midbrain dopamine neurons, encodes aversive stimuli and inhibits motor responses.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.1158183.618525 ◽

2009 ◽

Author(s):

Kent Berridge

Keyword(s):

Dopamine Neurons ◽

Motor Responses ◽

Aversive Stimuli ◽

Tegmental Nucleus ◽

Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus ◽

Midbrain Dopamine ◽

Midbrain Dopamine Neurons

Download Full-text

Monosynaptic Retrograde Tracing From Prelimbic Neuron Subpopulations Projecting to Either Nucleus Accumbens Core or Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus

Frontiers in Neural Circuits ◽

10.3389/fncir.2021.639733 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 ◽

Author(s):

Adelis M. Cruz ◽

Tabitha H. Kim ◽

Rachel J. Smith

Keyword(s):

Nucleus Accumbens ◽

Primary Source ◽

Nucleus Accumbens Core ◽

Cortical Input ◽

Reward Seeking ◽

Tegmental Nucleus ◽

Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus ◽

Cocaine Seeking ◽

Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus ◽

Motivated Behaviors

The prelimbic (PL) region of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been implicated in both driving and suppressing motivated behaviors, including cocaine-seeking in rats. These seemingly opposing functions may be mediated by different efferent targets of PL projections, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core and rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), which have contrasting roles in reward-seeking behaviors. We sought to characterize the anatomical connectivity differences between PL neurons projecting to NAc core and RMTg. We used conventional retrograde tracers to reveal distinct subpopulations of PL neurons projecting to NAc core vs. RMTg in rats, with very little overlap. To examine potential differences in input specificity for these two PL subpopulations, we then used Cre-dependent rabies virus (EnvA-RV-EGFP) as a monosynaptic retrograde tracer and targeted specific PL neurons via injections of retrograde CAV2-Cre in either NAc core or RMTg. We observed a similar catalog of cortical, thalamic, and limbic afferents for both NAc- and RMTg-projecting populations, with the primary source of afferent information arising from neighboring prefrontal neurons in ipsilateral PL and infralimbic cortex (IL). However, when the two subpopulations were directly compared, we found that RMTg-projecting PL neurons received a greater proportion of input from ipsilateral PL and IL, whereas NAc-projecting PL neurons received a greater proportion of input from most other cortical areas, mediodorsal thalamic nucleus, and several other subcortical areas. NAc-projecting PL neurons also received a greater proportion of contralateral cortical input. Our findings reveal that PL subpopulations differ not only in their efferent target but also in the input specificity from afferent structures. These differences in connectivity are likely to be critical to functional differences of PL subpopulations.

Download Full-text