scholarly journals Assessing Graduate Admissions Metrics

Physics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Rini
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Eric Landrum
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Norcross ◽  
Jessica L. Kohout ◽  
Marlene Wicherski

Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 187 (4175) ◽  
pp. 398-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Bickel ◽  
E. A. Hammel ◽  
J. W. O'Connell
Keyword(s):  
Sex Bias ◽  

Author(s):  
Nigel Ward ◽  

Potential applicants to graduate school find it difficult to predict, even approximately, which schools will accept them. We have created a predictive model of admissions decision-making, packaged in the form of a web page that allows students to enter their information and see a list of schools where they are likely to be accepted. This paper explains the rationale for the model’s design and parameter values. Interesting issues include the way that evidence is combined, the estimation of parameters, and the modeling of uncertainty.


2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Eric Landrum ◽  
Jeremy Clark

Ratings of importance were reviewed for nine graduate admissions criteria for the 573 graduate degree programs listed in American Psychological Association's Graduate Study in Psychology (2003). Overall, the three criteria receiving the highest percentages of importance ratings were letters of recommendation, statement of goals and objectives, and grade point average. Importance ratings varied depending on the degree programs offered. Results are discussed in terms of the advice offered students interested in admission to graduate school and the importance of students tailoring their graduate admissions process to their specific degree program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document