scholarly journals Neutrinoless double- β decay matrix elements in light nuclei

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pastore ◽  
J. Carlson ◽  
V. Cirigliano ◽  
W. Dekens ◽  
E. Mereghetti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Rath ◽  
Ramesh Chandra ◽  
K. Chaturvedi ◽  
P. K. Raina

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Tiburzi ◽  
Michael L. Wagman ◽  
Frank Winter ◽  
Emmanuel Chang ◽  
Zohreh Davoudi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Yao ◽  
A. Belley ◽  
R. Wirth ◽  
T. Miyagi ◽  
C. G. Payne ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. R21-R24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amand Faessler ◽  
W. A. Kaminski ◽  
G. Pantis ◽  
J. D. Vergados

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1950096
Author(s):  
P. K. Rath ◽  
A. Kumar ◽  
R. Chandra ◽  
R. Gautam ◽  
P. K. Raina ◽  
...  

Employing projected–Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov (PHFB) model, nuclear transition matrix elements (NTMEs) [Formula: see text] for the neutrinoless double-[Formula: see text] decay of [Formula: see text]Ge isotope are calculated within mechanisms involving light as well as heavy Majorana neutrinos, and classical Majorons. By considering the spin-tensor decomposition of realistic KUO and empirical JUN45 effective two-body interactions, it is noticed that the effect due to SRC on NTMEs [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] involving the exchange of light and heavy Majorana neutrinos, respectively, is maximally incorporated by the central part of the effective two-body interaction, which varies by a small amount with the inclusion of spin-orbit and tensor components. Presently, the model-dependent uncertainties in the average NTMEs [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] turn out to be about 10% and 37%, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document