scholarly journals Learning-based dynamic capabilities in closed-loop supply chains: an expert study

2022 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 69-84
Author(s):  
Ilkka Ritola ◽  
Harold Krikke ◽  
Marjolein C.J. Caniëls

Purpose Product returns information gives firms an opportunity for continuous strategic adaptation by allowing them to understand the reasons for product returns, learning from them and improving their products and processes accordingly. By applying the Dynamic Capabilities (DCs) view in the context of closed-loop supply chains (CLSC), this study explores how firms can continuously learn from product returns information.Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a qualitative Delphi study-inspired approach. Experts from industry and academia are interviewed in two interview rounds. First round of interviews are based on extant research, while the second round allows the experts to elaborate and correct the results.Findings This study culminates into a conceptual model for incremental learning from product returns information. The results indicate incremental learning from product returns can potentially lead to a competitive advantage. Additionally, the authors identify the sources of information, capabilities along with their microfoundations and the manifestations of product return information. Three propositions are formulated embedding the findings in DC theory.Research limitations/implications This study supports extant literature in confirming the value of product returns information and opens concrete avenues for research by providing several propositions.Practical implications This research elucidates the practices, processes and resources required for firms to utilize product returns information for continuous strategic adaptation. Practitioners can use these results while implementing continuous learning practices in their organizations.Originality/value This study presents the first systematic framework for incremental learning from product returns information. The authors apply the DC framework to a new functional domain, namely CLSC management and product returns management. Furthermore, the authors offer a concrete example of how organizational learning and DC intersect, thus advancing DC theoretical knowledge.

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 480-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacan Wang ◽  
Benjamin T. Hazen ◽  
Diane A. Mollenkopf

Purpose The success of closed loop supply chains is contingent upon consumer acceptance of remanufactured products, yet little is known about how consumers value such products. The purpose of this paper is to provide theoretical grounding for understanding consumers’ value perceptions as related to remanufactured products. Design/methodology/approach Diffusion of innovation theory and customer perceived value literature help form the theoretical model, which is tested empirically using survey data of consumers. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the hypotheses. Findings Perceived value of remanufactured products is measured as a function of perceived benefits (environmental benefits; price advantage) and perceived sacrifices (perceived quality; perceived risk), all of which are shown to impact perceived value. Additionally, perceived risk is found to partially mediate the relationship between perceived quality and perceived value. Originality/value This research makes two significant contributions. First, mid-range theory that is contextualized to the closed loop supply chain is developed to aid researchers and practitioners in better understanding the consumer’s role in the closed loop supply chain, as related to the acceptance of remanufactured products. Second, consumer acceptance of remanufactured products represents a form of supply chain demand risk that has previously been unrecognized. The results provide a foundation for incorporating this type of demand risk in to future research efforts.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wells ◽  
Margarete Seitz

PurposeTo delineate typologies that capture the relationship between closed‐loop supply chains and value‐added business models, and thereby to suggest a research agenda for the transition to sustainable business.Design/methodology/approachDevelops four new theoretical categories or typologies of closed‐loop systems and applies them to the context of the automotive industry. Conceptual, rather than empirical.FindingsThat hybrid closed‐loop systems can be combined with innovative non‐linear value configurations to enable the transition to more sustainable production and consumption.Research limitations/implicationsIdentifies research agenda to explore how novel business models can integrate with various closed‐loop systems. Theoretical, but grounded in research into the automotive industry.Practical implicationsThat closed‐loop systems are best implemented outside traditional linear value added structures.Originality/valuePlaces closed‐loop systems at the heart of the (redesigned) business model rather than as an accessory that must be adapted to the demands of existing approaches. Suggests scholars should be part of this innovative process, not merely observers.


2012 ◽  
Vol 472-475 ◽  
pp. 3305-3311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu Hassan Zarina ◽  
Luong Lee ◽  
Sang Heon Lee

This paper deals with production-inventory policy in the context of multi-echelon closed-loop supply chains. The system comprises of a number of distributors, single manufacturer, single supplier and single dismantler. The objective is to develop and formulate the mathematical modeling for deterministic approach.


Author(s):  
Zhidan Wu ◽  
Xiaohu Qian ◽  
Min Huang ◽  
Wai Ki Ching ◽  
Xingwei Wang ◽  
...  

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 464-469
Author(s):  
Christian Scheller ◽  
Steffen Blömeke ◽  
Mathias Nippraschk ◽  
Kerstin Schmidt ◽  
Mark Mennenga ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (46) ◽  
pp. 16267-16283 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sundar Raj ◽  
S. Lakshminarayanan ◽  
J. F. Forbes

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Daniel R. Guide ◽  
Terry P. Harrison ◽  
Luk N. Van Wassenhove

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document