Manner of Articulation based Split Lattices for Phoneme Recognition

Author(s):  
R. Pradeep ◽  
K. Sreenivasa Rao
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taina T. Välimaa ◽  
Taisto K. Määttä ◽  
Heikki J. Löppönen ◽  
Martti J. Sorri

The aim of this study was to investigate how postlingually severely or profoundly hearing-impaired adults relearn to recognize consonants after receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Consonant recognition of 19 Finnish-speaking subjects was studied for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 24 months using an open-set nonsense-syllable test in a prospective repeated-measure design. Responses were coded for phoneme errors, and proportions of correct responses and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for recognition and confusions. Two years after the switch-on, the mean recognition of consonants was 71% (95% confidence interval = 68–73%). The manner of articulation was easier to classify than the place of articulation, and the consonants [s], [r], [k], [t], [p], [n], and [j] were easier to recognize than [h], [m], [l], and [υ]. Adaptation to electrical hearing with a multichannel cochlear implant was successful, but consonants with alveolar, palatal, or velar transitions (high F2) were better recognized than consonants with labial transitions (low F2). The locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with better recognition was at the frequencies 1.5–2 kHz, whereas the locus of the F2 transitions of the consonants with poorer recognition was at 1.2–1.4 kHz. A tendency to confuse consonants with the closest consonant with higher F2 transition was also noted.


1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarissa R. Smith

Residual hearing, phoneme recognition, speech production errors, and selected background variables were examined in 40 congenitally deaf children of normal intelligence who had no apparent anomalies other than deafness, in an effort to identify factors most closely associated with speech intelligibility. Mean intelligibility of the recorded speech of the children, to inexperienced listeners, was 18.7%, corresponding closely with results of previous studies. Scores on the total and some portions of the phoneme recognition test showed significant correlations with both phoneme production and speech intelligibility. The correlation between phoneme production errors and intelligibility was −0.80. A sizable proportion of the dispersion could be accounted for by certain prosodic errors, such as those resulting from improper phonatory control. Errors of place of articulation and voicing remained in essentially the same proportion for all speakers. Errors of manner and combined place and manner of articulation showed a slight systematic decrease from the poorest to the best speakers. Omissions decreased sharply, but not systematically. Vowel errors showed the most marked and systematic decrease as intelligibility improved. Children of deaf parents were poorer in phoneme recognition and in speech intelligibility than children with comparable residual hearing but with hearing parents.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 200395-200411
Author(s):  
Ahmed B. Ibrahim ◽  
Yasser Mohammad Seddiq ◽  
Ali Hamid Meftah ◽  
Mansour Alghamdi ◽  
Sid-Ahmed Selouani ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswajit Das ◽  
Sandipan Mandal ◽  
Pabitra Mitra ◽  
Anupam Basu

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 800-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Gallun ◽  
Pamela Souza

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document