A common lexicon for spatial sound quality assessment - latest developments

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Zacharov ◽  
Torben Pedersen ◽  
Chris Pike
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Spatial Sound

Sound Quality Assessment of Powered Seat Adjusters

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Cerrato ◽  
Alun Crewe ◽  
John Terech
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality

Development of psychoacoustic model based on the correlation of the subjective and objective sound quality assessment of automatic washing machines

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 178-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Moravec ◽  
Gabriela Ižaríková ◽  
Pavol Liptai ◽  
Miroslav Badida ◽  
Anna Badidová
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Psychoacoustic Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Washing Machines

Sound quality assessment of sewing machines

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Chatterley ◽  
Jonathan D. Blotter ◽  
Scott D. Sommerfeldt ◽  
Timothy W. Leishman
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality

Active control of engine noise transmitted into cavities: simulation, experimental validation and sound quality assessment

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 3872-3872
Author(s):  
Leopoldo P. De Oliveira ◽  
Paul Sas ◽  
Wim Desmet ◽  
Karl Janssens ◽  
Peter Gajdatsy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Engine Noise

Update on sound quality assessment with TWO!EARS

2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 3974-3974
Author(s):  
Alexander Raake ◽  
Janto Skowronek ◽  
Hagen Wierstorf ◽  
Christoph Hold
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality

Sound Quality Assessment Using Auditory Models

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Harlander ◽  
Rainer Huber ◽  
Stephan Ewert
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Auditory Models

scholarly journals Bimodal Hearing in Individuals with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: Benefits, Challenges, and Management

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dunbar ◽  
Sarah Warren
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Binaural Hearing ◽  
Sound Quality ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Understanding In Noise ◽  
Outcomes Measures ◽  
Spatial Sound ◽  
Integration Management ◽  
Bimodal Hearing

AbstractBinaural hearing offers numerous advantages over monaural hearing. While bilateral implants are a successful treatment option for some patients, many individuals choose to achieve binaural hearing by using a cochlear implant with a contralateral hearing aid. Compared with monaural hearing, benefits of bimodal hearing include improved speech perception in quiet and in noise, improved localization, and more natural sound quality. Despite the advantages, there exist disadvantages to bimodal hearing, primarily related to binaural integration. Management of these devices can be challenging in that the hearing aid and cochlear implant may be managed by different clinicians. When fitting devices, strategies are recommended to optimize the integration of input from both devices. In managing bimodal devices, recommended outcomes measures include those that would reflect bimodal benefit, such as speech understanding in noise and spatial sound quality perception.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document