On Modeling Human Learning in Sequential Games with Delayed Reinforcements

Author(s):  
Roi Ceren ◽  
Prashant Doshi ◽  
Matthew Meisel ◽  
Adam Goodie ◽  
Dan Hall
1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 558-559
Author(s):  
Timothy Anderson
Keyword(s):  

1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 376-377
Author(s):  
LEAH L. LIGHT
Keyword(s):  

1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward L. Thorndike
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Kelemen ◽  
Catherine E. Creeley
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark B. Suret ◽  
Mike E. Le Pelley ◽  
Thomas Beesley

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 949-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
MELVIN H. MARX ◽  
DAVID W. WITTER ◽  
JOHN FARBRY

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Stephen Ferrigno ◽  
Yiyun Huang ◽  
Jessica F. Cantlon

The capacity for logical inference is a critical aspect of human learning, reasoning, and decision-making. One important logical inference is the disjunctive syllogism: given A or B, if not A, then B. Although the explicit formation of this logic requires symbolic thought, previous work has shown that nonhuman animals are capable of reasoning by exclusion, one aspect of the disjunctive syllogism (e.g., not A = avoid empty). However, it is unknown whether nonhuman animals are capable of the deductive aspects of a disjunctive syllogism (the dependent relation between A and B and the inference that “if not A, then B” must be true). Here, we used a food-choice task to test whether monkeys can reason through an entire disjunctive syllogism. Our results show that monkeys do have this capacity. Therefore, the capacity is not unique to humans and does not require language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document