The underlying basis for the trade‐off between leaf size and leafing intensity

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingxin Huang ◽  
Martin J. Lechowicz ◽  
Charles A. Price ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongmei Yang ◽  
Guoyong Li ◽  
Shucun Sun
Keyword(s):  

AoB Plants ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Sun ◽  
Mantang Wang ◽  
Min Lyu ◽  
Karl J Niklas ◽  
Quanlin Zhong ◽  
...  

Abstract The trade-off between leaf number and individual leaf size on current-year shoots (twigs) is crucial to light interception and thus net carbon gain. However, a theoretical basis for understanding this trade-off remains elusive. Here, we argue that this trade-off emerges directly from the relationship between annual growth in leaf and stem mass, a hypothesis that predicts that maximum individual leaf size (i.e. leaf mass, Mmax, or leaf area, Amax) will scale negatively and isometrically with leafing intensity (i.e. leaf number per unit stem mass, per unit stem volume or per stem cross-sectional area). We tested this hypothesis by analysing the twigs of 64 species inhabiting three different forest communities along an elevation gradient using standardized major axis (SMA) analyses. Across species, maximum individual leaf size (Mmax, Amax) scaled isometrically with respect to leafing intensity; the scaling constants between maximum leaf size and leafing intensity (based on stem cross-sectional area) differed significantly among the three forests. Therefore, our hypothesis successfully predicts a scaling relationship between maximum individual leaf size and leafing intensity, and provides a general explanation for the leaf size-number trade-off as a consequence of mechanical-hydraulic constraints on stem and leaf growth per year.


2007 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID KLEIMAN ◽  
LONNIE W. AARSSEN
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Dombroskie ◽  
Lonnie W. Aarssen
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 788-797
Author(s):  
HAN Ling ◽  
◽  
ZHAO Cheng-Zhang ◽  
XU Ting ◽  
FENG Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Botany ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Scott ◽  
Lonnie W. Aarssen

Leafing intensity—number of leaves produced per unit of supporting (nonleaf, aboveground) dry mass—determines the size of a plant’s “bud bank”, i.e., the number of axillary meristems per unit plant body or shoot size. This in turn determines the plant’s capacity for flexible and economic meristem deployment strategies as vegetative or reproductive structures. From recent research, it is now widely established that leafing intensity has a strong and isometrically negative relationship with individual leaf mass at the between-species level for both woody and herbaceous species. In the present study of 24 natural populations of herbaceous angiosperms, we show that these two traits also have a general trade-off relationship at the between-plant level within a species. Smaller resident reproductive (i.e., mature) plants generally produced smaller leaves, and plants with smaller leaves generally had higher leafing intensity, in most cases involving an isometric trade-off. For several species, however, the trade-off was allometric—i.e., plants with smaller leaves, which also had generally smaller body sizes, had generally greater than proportionally higher leafing intensity. This parallels results of an earlier study at the between-species level suggesting that, when plant body size is relatively small, there may be a premium—in terms of maximizing fitness—on relatively high leafing intensity. The latter, it is proposed, may function in maximizing the capacity for “reproductive economy”, i.e., successful reproduction despite intense size suppression owing to competition.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Berberi ◽  
Paolo S. Segre ◽  
Douglas L. Altshuler ◽  
Roslyn Dakin

ABSTRACTUnpredictable movement can provide an advantage when animals avoid predators and other threats. Previous studies have examined how varying environments can elicit unpredictable movement, but the intrinsic causes of complex, unpredictable behavior are not yet known. We addressed this question by analyzing >200 hours of flight performed by hummingbirds, a group of aerial specialists noted for their extreme agility and escape performance. We used information theory to calculate unpredictability based on the positional entropy of short flight sequences during 30-min and 2-hour trials. We show that a bird’s entropy is repeatable, with stable differences among individuals that are negatively correlated with wing loading: birds with lower wing loading are less predictable. Unpredictability is also positively correlated with a bird’s overall acceleration and rotational performance, and yet we find that moment-to-moment changes in acceleration and rotational velocities do not directly influence entropy. This indicates that biomechanical performance must share an underlying basis with a bird’s ability to combine maneuvers into unpredictable sequences. Contrary to expectations, hummingbirds achieve their highest entropy at relatively slow speeds, pointing to a fundamental trade-off whereby individuals must choose to be either fast or unpredictable.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Whitman ◽  
L. W. Aarssen
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleyman Tufekci
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document