scholarly journals Measuring β-diversity with species abundance data

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 1112-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise J. Barwell ◽  
Nick J. B. Isaac ◽  
William E. Kunin
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J Gleich ◽  
Jacob A Cram ◽  
Jake L Weissman ◽  
David A Caron

Ecological network analyses are used to identify potential biotic interactions between microorganisms from species abundance data. These analyses are often carried out using time-series data; however, time-series networks have unique statistical challenges. Time-dependent species abundance data can lead to species co-occurrence patterns that are not a result of direct, biotic associations and may therefore result in inaccurate network predictions. Here, we describe a generalize additive model (GAM)-based data transformation that removes time-series signals from species abundance data prior to running network analyses. Validation of the transformation was carried out by generating mock, time-series datasets, with an underlying covariance structure, running network analyses on these datasets with and without our GAM transformation, and comparing the network outputs to the known covariance structure of the simulated data. The results revealed that seasonal abundance patterns substantially decreased the accuracy of the inferred networks. Additionally, the GAM transformation increased the F1 score of inferred ecological networks on average and improved the ability of network inference methods to capture important features of network structure. This study underscores the importance of considering temporal features when carrying out network analyses and describes a simple, effective tool that can be used to improve results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo A. Scrosati ◽  
Matthew J. Freeman ◽  
Julius A. Ellrich

We introduce and test the subhabitat dependence hypothesis (SDH) in biogeography. This hypothesis posits that biogeographic pattern within a region differs when determined with species abundance data from different subhabitat types. It stems from the notion that the main abiotic factors that drive species distribution in different subhabitat types across a biogeographic region often vary differently across space. To test the SDH, we measured the abundance of algae and sessile invertebrates in two different subhabitats (high intertidal zone and mid-intertidal zone) at eight locations along the Atlantic Canadian coast. We conducted multivariate analyses of the species abundance data to compare alongshore biogeographic pattern between both zones. For both subhabitat types, location groupings based on community similarity not always responded to geographic proximity, leading to biogeographic patchiness to some extent. Nonetheless, both biogeographic patterns were statistically unrelated, thus supporting the SDH. This lack of concordance was most evident for southern locations, which clustered together based on high-intertidal data but showed considerable alongshore patchiness based on mid-intertidal data. We also found that the ordination pattern of these eight locations based on sea surface temperature data was significantly related to biogeographic pattern for the mid-intertidal zone but not for the high intertidal zone. This finding supports the rationale behind the SDH due to the longer periods of submergence experienced by the mid-intertidal zone. Overall, we conclude that biogeographic pattern within a region can depend on the surveyed subhabitat type. Thus, biological surveys restricted to specific subhabitats may not properly reveal biogeographic pattern for a biota as a whole or even just for other subhabitats. As many studies generate biogeographic information with data only for specific subhabitats, we recommend testing the SDH in other systems to determine its domain of application.


Oikos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (9) ◽  
pp. 1057-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Ulrich ◽  
Santiago Soliveres ◽  
Wojciech Kryszewski ◽  
Fernando T. Maestre ◽  
Nicholas J. Gotelli

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Ricotta ◽  
Sandrine Pavoine ◽  
Giovanni Bacaro ◽  
Alicia T. R. Acosta

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Oldeland ◽  
Dirk Wesuls ◽  
Duccio Rocchini ◽  
Michael Schmidt ◽  
Norbert Jürgens

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e1004134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Al Hammal ◽  
David Alonso ◽  
Rampal S. Etienne ◽  
Stephen J. Cornell

Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Cox

Quantile plots showing by default ordered values versus cumulative probabilities are both well known and also often neglected, considering their major advantages. Their flexibility and power is emphasized by using the qplot program to show several variants on the standard form, making full use of options for reverse, ranked, and transformed scales and for superimposing and juxtaposing quantile traces. Examples are drawn from the analysis of species abundance data in ecology. A revised version of qplot is formally released with this column. Distribution plots in which the axes are interchanged are also discussed briefly, in conjunction with a revised version of distplot, also released now.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document