Autism, Modularity and Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Coltheart ◽  
Robyn Langdon
Author(s):  
Joulia Smortchkova ◽  
Michael Murez

Many debates in philosophy of mind and cognitive science focus on whether folk or scientific psychological notions pick out cognitive natural kinds. Examples include memory, emotions, and concepts. A potentially interesting type of kind is kinds of mental representations (as opposed, for example, to kinds of psychological faculties). This chapter outlines a proposal for a theory of representational kinds in cognitive science. It argues that the explanatory role of representational kinds in scientific theories, in conjunction with a mainstream approach to explanation in cognitive science, suggests that representational kinds are multilevel. This is to say that representational kinds’ properties cluster at different levels of explanation and allow for intra- and interlevel projections.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles P. Davis ◽  
Gerry T. M. Altmann ◽  
Eiling Yee

Abstract Gilead et al.'s approach to human cognition places abstraction and prediction at the heart of “mental travel” under a “representational diversity” perspective that embraces foundational concepts in cognitive science. But, it gives insufficient credit to the possibility that the process of abstraction produces a gradient, and underestimates the importance of a highly influential domain in predictive cognition: language, and related, the emergence of experientially based structure through time.


2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mahoney
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 839-840
Author(s):  
James S. Uleman

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 692-693
Author(s):  
Keith Rayner
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 493-494
Author(s):  
Jane Grimshaw
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document