scholarly journals Women’s experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic: A qualitative evaluation

Author(s):  
Nicola Boydell ◽  
John J Reynolds‐Wright ◽  
Sharon T Cameron ◽  
Jeni Harden
2020 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeni Harden ◽  
Julie Ancian ◽  
Sharon Cameron ◽  
Nicola Boydell

BackgroundBetween 2017 and 2019, legislation was introduced in the UK that approved the home as a place for self-administration of misoprostol for early medical abortion. While research has shown that early medical abortion at home is as safe as in a clinical setting, women’s experiences in the UK in the light of this change have not yet been investigated. This qualitative research explored the experiences of women in one region of Scotland, UK who accessed early medical abortion with home self-administration of misoprostol.MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 20 women who had recently undergone early medical abortion (≤69 days' gestation) with home self-administration of misoprostol. The data were analysed thematically using an approach informed by the Framework analytic approach.ResultsWomen appreciated the flexibility that home administration of misoprostol offered, including the opportunity to control the timing of the abortion. This was particularly important for women who sought not to disclose the abortion to others. Most women valued being in the comfort and privacy of the home when preparing for self-administration, although a small number highlighted some concerns about being at home. Most women reported that self-administration of misoprostol was straightforward; however, some expressed concerns around assessing whether their experiences were ‘normal’.ConclusionsWomen welcomed the opportunity for home self-administration of misoprostol. To further improve women’s early medical abortion experience we suggest that the legislation be amended so that women can self-administer in an appropriate non-clinical setting, not just their home.


2020 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2019-200568
Author(s):  
Shin Thong Low ◽  
Zhong Eric Chen ◽  
Sharon Cameron

BackgroundGuidelines from the UK recommend that women should be able to self-refer to abortion services. In 2016, a self-referral system was introduced to the abortion service in Edinburgh, Scotland, as an option for women. Women could telephone a dedicated phone line during office hours and speak to an administrative assistant working in the abortion service who provided them the next available appointment to be seen in the service. This study aimed to evaluate a self-referral service to abortion by investigating its impact on women’s experiences of the referral process.Methodology21 semistructured interviews of women attending a specialist abortion service in Edinburgh, Scotland, were conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. The interviews focused on women’s experience of the referral process.ResultsThree main themes arose from the interviews, including reasons for choosing self-referral, experience of self-referral and challenges to using self-referral. Reasons for choosing self-referral were related to convenience, privacy and autonomy. Women found the experience of self-referral to be pleasant, non-judgemental and patient-centred, and self-referral prepared them for the appointment at the specialist abortion service. However, some women felt rushed, and self-referral made them anxious to attend the appointment. Challenges were difficulty with getting through on telephone lines, varying levels of support required for different individuals and awareness about the option of self-referral.ConclusionWomen valued the option of self-referral. Women felt that the service should be expanded to increase availability,and promoted to women more widely within the community .


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 900-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Sloan ◽  
Katarzyna A. Campbell ◽  
Katharine Bowker ◽  
Tim Coleman ◽  
Sue Cooper ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1022-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret R. Rogers ◽  
Meryl Sirmans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document