Modeling of the Shale Volume Using Seismic Attributes and Artificial Neural Networks in the Hendijan Oil Field

Author(s):  
Mahdi TAHERI ◽  
Ali Asghar CIABEGHODSI ◽  
Ramin NIKROUZ ◽  
Ali KADKHODAI
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. T1067-T1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula Iturrarán-Viveros ◽  
Andrés M. Muñoz-García ◽  
Jorge O. Parra ◽  
Josué Tago

We have applied instantaneous seismic attributes to a stacked P-wave reflected seismic section in the Tenerife field located in the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin in Colombia to estimate the volume of clay [Formula: see text] and the density [Formula: see text] at seismic scale. The well logs and the seismic attributes associated to the seismic trace closer to one of the available wells (Tenerife-2) is the information used to train some multilayered artificial neural networks (ANN). We perform data analysis via the gamma test, a mathematically nonparametric nonlinear smooth modeling tool, to choose the best input combination of seismic attributes to train ANNs to estimate [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Once the ANNs are trained, they are applied to predict these parameters along the seismic line. From the continuous estimations of [Formula: see text], we distinguish two facies: sands for [Formula: see text] and shales when [Formula: see text]. These estimations confirm the production of the Mugrosa C-Sands zone, and we draw the brown shale that correlates with the high-amplitude attributes and the yellow sand that correlates with the low-amplitude attributes. Using the well-log information for [Formula: see text] and the facies classification (also in the well log), two cubic polynomials that depend on time (or depth) are obtained, one for sands and the other for shales, to fit the [Formula: see text]. These two cubic polynomials and the facies classification obtained from the [Formula: see text] at the seismic scale enable us to estimate [Formula: see text] at the seismic scale. To validate the 2D [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] predicted data, a forward-modeling software (the Kennett reflectivity algorithm) is used. This model calculates synthetic seismograms that are compared with the real seismograms. This comparison indicates a small misfit that suggests that the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] images are representing the reservoir description characteristics and the ANN method is accurate to map these parameters.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5844
Author(s):  
Chenglong Chen ◽  
Yikun Liu ◽  
Decai Lin ◽  
Guohui Qu ◽  
Jiqiang Zhi ◽  
...  

Accurately predicting oilfield development indicators (such as oil production, liquid production, current formation pressure, water cut, oil production rate, recovery rate, cost, profit, etc.) is to realize the rational and scientific development of oilfields, which is an important basis to ensure the stable production of the oilfield. Due to existing oilfield development index prediction methods being difficult to accurately reflect the complex nonlinear problem in the oil field development process, using the artificial neural network, which can predict the oilfield development index with the function of infinitely close to any non-linear function, will be the most ideal prediction method at present. This article summarizes four commonly used artificial neural networks: the BP neural network, the radial basis neural network, the generalized regression neural network, and the wavelet neural network, and mainly introduces their network structure, function types, calculation process and prediction results. Four kinds of artificial neural networks are optimized through various intelligent algorithms, and the principle and essence of optimization are analyzed. Furthermore, the advantages and disadvantages of the four artificial neural networks are summarized and compared. Finally, based on the application of artificial neural networks in other fields and on existing problems, a future development direction is proposed which can serve as a reference and guide for the research on accurate prediction of oilfield development indicators.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Sitouah ◽  
Gabor Korvin ◽  
Abdulatif Al-Shuhail ◽  
Osman MAbdullatif ◽  
Abdulazeez Abdulraheem ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document