scholarly journals The Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Point‐of‐care Ultrasound for Nephrolithiasis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 684-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Wong ◽  
Braden Teitge ◽  
Marshall Ross ◽  
Paul Young ◽  
Helen Lee Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Is point-of-care ultrasound a reliable predictor of outcome during atraumatic, non-shockable cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the SHoC investigators

Resuscitation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Lalande ◽  
Talia Burwash-Brennan ◽  
Katharine Burns ◽  
Paul Atkinson ◽  
Michael Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Reliable Predictor

Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound and radiology-performed ultrasound for intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1760-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Yang Tsou ◽  
Yu-Hsun Wang ◽  
Yu-Kun Ma ◽  
Julia K. Deanehan ◽  
Jason Gillon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

scholarly journals LO42: Is point-of-care ultrasound a reliable predictor of outcome during atraumatic, non-shockable cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S22-S23
Author(s):  
E. Lalande ◽  
T. Burwash-Brennan ◽  
K. Burns ◽  
P. Atkinson ◽  
M. Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
World Health ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound

Introduction: Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) is being increasingly utilized during cardiac arrests for prognosis. Following the publication of recent studies, the goal of this study was to systematically review and analyze the literature to evaluate the accuracy of PoCUS in predicting return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission (SHA), and survival to hospital discharge (SHD) in adult patients with non-traumatic, non- shockable out- of-hospital or emergency department cardiac arrest. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was completed. A search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization Registry was completed from 1974 until August 24th 2018. Adult randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was applied by two independent reviewers. Data analysis was completed according to PRISMA guidelines and with a random effects model for the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistics. Results: Ten studies (1,485 participants) were included. Cardiac activity on PoCUS had a pooled sensitivity of 59.9% (95% confidence interval 36.5%-79.4%) and specificity of 91.5% (80.8%-96.5%) for ROSC; 74.7% (58.3%-86.2%) and 80.5% (71.7%-87.4%) for SHA; and 69.4% (45.5%-86.0%) and 74.6% (59.8%-85.3%) for SHD. The sensitivity of cardiac activity on PoCUS for predicting ROSC was 24.7%(6.8%-59.4%) in the asystole subgroup compared with 77% (59.4%-88.5%) within the PEA subgroup. Cardiac activity on PoCUS, compared to an absence had an odd ratio of 15.9 (5.9-42.5) for ROSC, 9.8 (4.9-19.4) for SHA and 5.7 (2.1-15.6) for SHD. Positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 6.65 (3.16-14.0) and negative LR was 0.27 (0.12-0.61) for ROSC. Conclusion: Cardiac activity on PoCUS was associated with improved odds for ROSC, SHA, and SHD among adults with non-traumatic asystole and PEA. We report lower sensitivity and higher negative likelihood ratio, but with greater heterogeneity compared to previous systematic reviews. PoCUS may provide valuable information in the management of non-traumatic PEA or asystole, but should not be viewed as the sole predictor in determining outcomes in these patients.

scholarly journals MP05: Diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in undifferentiated hypotension presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S43-S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Richardson ◽  
O. Loubani ◽  
P. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Full Article ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Strong Conclusion

Introduction: Undifferentiated hypotension remains one of the most life-threatening presentations to emergency departments (ED) around the world. An accurate and rapid initial assessment is essential, as shock carries a high mortality with multiple unique etiologies and management plans. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) has emerged as a promising tool to improve these diagnostic and management challenges, yet its reliability in this setting remains unclear. Methods: We performed a systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to June 8, 2018. Databases were reviewed by two independent researchers and all languages were included. The methodological quality of included studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Our primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS in hypotension, with secondary outcomes including patient outcomes and changes to management. Results: Our literature search revealed 5345 articles after duplicates were removed, leaving 235 articles for full article review. Following full article review, 9 studies remained and were included in the systematic review. There were 2 randomized control trials, 6 prospective cohort trials, and 1 retrospective cohort trial. For our primary outcome of diagnostic accuracy, eight studies were included; we extracted Kappa values ranging from 0.70 to 0.971, pooled sensitivity ranging from 69% to 88%, and pooled specificity ranging from 88% to 96%. Four studies reported on management change including results reporting shorter time to disposition, change in diagnostic test ordering (18% to 31%), change in consultation (13.6%), change in admission location (12%) and change in management plan (25% to 40%). Only one study reported on patient outcomes, which revealed no survival or length of stay benefit. Conclusion: When assessing for the diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS in the setting of undifferentiated hypotension presenting to the emergency department, we found fair consistency between PoCUS and final diagnosis with high Kappa values, fair to good pooled sensitivities, and good to excellent specificities. There was no strong evidence indicating improved outcomes. However, the large amount of heterogeneity amongst studies has limited our ability to make a strong conclusion except that future research should focus on a uniform study design and patient focused outcomes.

scholarly journals The prognostic value of emergency department measured hypertension: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Reynard ◽  
Patricia van den Berg ◽  
Govind Oliver ◽  
Mina Peter Naguib ◽  
Camilla Sammut‐Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Prognostic value of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Kedan ◽  
William Ciozda ◽  
Joseph A. Palatinus ◽  
Helen N. Palatinus ◽  
Asher Kimchi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document