Reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation in relation to semen parameters: A retrospective study and systematic review

Andrologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochuan Chen ◽  
Canquan Zhou

Andrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Anagnostis ◽  
Dimitrios Papanikolaou ◽  
Pinelopi G. Ioannidou ◽  
Julia K. Bosdou ◽  
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liying Sun ◽  
Yiran Jiang ◽  
Huihui Gao ◽  
Yusa He ◽  
Peige Song ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 444 ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Cui ◽  
Gangwei Han ◽  
Yonggang Shang ◽  
Chengcheng Liu ◽  
Liubing Xia ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrika Åsenius ◽  
Amy F Danson ◽  
Sarah J Marzi

Abstract BACKGROUND Studies in non-human mammals suggest that environmental factors can influence spermatozoal DNA methylation, and some research suggests that spermatozoal DNA methylation is also implicated in conditions such as subfertility and imprinting disorders in the offspring. Together with an increased availability of cost-effective methods of interrogating DNA methylation, this premise has led to an increasing number of studies investigating the DNA methylation landscape of human spermatozoa. However, how the human spermatozoal DNA methylome is influenced by environmental factors is still unclear, as is the role of human spermatozoal DNA methylation in subfertility and in influencing offspring health. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise the quality of the current body of literature on DNA methylation in human spermatozoa, summarize current knowledge and generate recommendations for future research. SEARCH METHODS A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using the search terms ‘semen’ OR ‘sperm’ AND ‘DNA methylation’. Publications from 1 January 2003 to 2 March 2020 that studied human sperm and were written in English were included. Studies that used sperm DNA methylation to develop methodologies or forensically identify semen were excluded, as were reviews, commentaries, meta-analyses or editorial texts. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were used to objectively evaluate quality of evidence in each included publication. OUTCOMES The search identified 446 records, of which 135 were included in the systematic review. These 135 studies were divided into three groups according to area of research; 56 studies investigated the influence of spermatozoal DNA methylation on male fertility and abnormal semen parameters, 20 studies investigated spermatozoal DNA methylation in pregnancy outcomes including offspring health and 59 studies assessed the influence of environmental factors on spermatozoal DNA methylation. Findings from studies that scored as ‘high’ and ‘moderate’ quality of evidence according to GRADE criteria were summarized. We found that male subfertility and abnormal semen parameters, in particular oligozoospermia, appear to be associated with abnormal spermatozoal DNA methylation of imprinted regions. However, no specific DNA methylation signature of either subfertility or abnormal semen parameters has been convincingly replicated in genome-scale, unbiased analyses. Furthermore, although findings require independent replication, current evidence suggests that the spermatozoal DNA methylome is influenced by cigarette smoking, advanced age and environmental pollutants. Importantly however, from a clinical point of view, there is no convincing evidence that changes in spermatozoal DNA methylation influence pregnancy outcomes or offspring health. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Although it appears that the human sperm DNA methylome can be influenced by certain environmental and physiological traits, no findings have been robustly replicated between studies. We have generated a set of recommendations that would enhance the reliability and robustness of findings of future analyses of the human sperm methylome. Such studies will likely require multicentre collaborations to reach appropriate sample sizes, and should incorporate phenotype data in more complex statistical models.



2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor P. Kohn ◽  
Samuel J. Ohlander ◽  
Jake S. Jacob ◽  
Tina M. Griffin ◽  
Larry I. Lipshultz ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Chairat Burusapat ◽  
Nutthapong Wanichjaroen ◽  
Nuttadon Wongprakob ◽  
Kantang Satayasoontorn

Abstract Marjolin’s ulcer is rare and aggressive malignancy. The objective was to conduct a review of Marjolin’s ulcer cases to gain a better understanding and its management. A retrospective study of patients with Marjolin’s ulcers at our hospital between 2010 and 2019 was conducted. For the systematic review, the electronic database of the National Library of Medicine was searched and articles published between 2000 and 2019 were included. A total of 14 patients were included in the retrospective study. Twelve patients were male. The mean age was 59.71 years. The latency period was 27.78 years. The most common malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma, and 71.43% had developed on the lower extremities. Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas occurred in 38.46% of the cases Rates of lymphovascular and perineural invasion were 30.77 and 23.08%, respectively. Results from the literature search yielded 80 case reports (91 cases) and 42 retrospective reviews (1216 cases). Most cases were male and the most common location was lower extremities. The latency period for the acute and chronic periods was 2.75 months and 20.75 years, respectively. The most common malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma (92.27% in the retrospective reviews) and 59.98% of the cases exhibited well-differentiation. Rates of regional lymph node involvement and distant metastases were 10.20 and 12.09%, respectively. Marjolin’s ulcer in 21st century is not so rare. The most common is well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Early flap surgery or skin grafts for chronic ulcers or burn scars are recommended to reduce risk. Guideline for surgical management is established.





2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Al-Ghazo ◽  
Ibrahim Fathi Ghalayini ◽  
Rami S Al-Azab ◽  
Ibrahim Bani-Hani ◽  
Mohammad S. Daradkeh


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document