Linear measurements of sinus floor elevation based on voxel‐based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography images

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1048-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Huang ◽  
Jiahui Hu ◽  
Rongchun Luo ◽  
Sisi Xie ◽  
Zuolin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Sinus Floor

Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e12362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Kawakami ◽  
Niklaus P. Lang ◽  
Takahisa Iida ◽  
Mauro Ferri ◽  
Karol A. Apaza Alccayhuaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Sinus Floor

Sinus floor elevation or referral for further diagnosis and therapy: A comparison of maxillary sinus assessment by ENT specialists and dentists using cone beam computed tomography

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 463-475
Author(s):  
Simone F. M. Janner ◽  
Patrick Dubach ◽  
Valerie G. A. Suter ◽  
Marco D. Caversaccio ◽  
Daniel Buser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Diagnosis And Therapy ◽  
Sinus Floor

scholarly journals Remodeling of Autogenous Bone Grafts after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Assessed by Limited Cone Beam Computed Tomography

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Nishida ◽  
Yuka Takenouchi ◽  
Kyoko Mori ◽  
Miyuki Ariji ◽  
Kaori Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafts

scholarly journals Accuracy of linear measurements obtained from stitched cone beam computed tomography images versus direct skull measurements

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doaa Ahmed Fouad Hamed ◽  
Mostafa Mohamed El Dawlatly ◽  
Sahar Hosny El Dessouky ◽  
Reham Mohamed Hamdy
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Lateral Plane ◽  
Skull Measurements ◽  
Human Skulls

Background: To assess whether the linear measurements obtained from stitched cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were as accurate as the direct skull measurements. Methods: Nine dry human skulls were marked with gutta-percha at reference points to obtain Twenty-two linear measurements on each skull. Ten measurements in the cranio-caudal plane, two measurements in the antero-posterior plane, and ten measurements in the medio-lateral plane. CBCT linear measurements obtained using stitching software were measured and compared with direct skull measurements. Results: The absolute Dahlberg error between direct linear measurements and linear measurements on stitched CBCT images ranged from (0.07 mm to 0.41 mm). The relative Dahlberg error ranged from (0.2% to 1.8%). Moreover, Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from (0.97 to 1.0) indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: Stitched CBCT linear measurements were highly comparable to the direct skull measurements using a digital caliper.

Accuracy of Linear Measurements and Visibility of the Mandibular Canal of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images With Different Voxel Sizes: An In Vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Borges Waltrick ◽  
Murillo José Nunes de Abreu Junior ◽  
Márcio Corrêa ◽  
Michella Dinah Zastrow ◽  
Vinícius D’Avila Dutra
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

scholarly journals Schneiderian membrane thickness: Cone Beam Computed Tomography analysis pre and post-sinus floor elevation procedures

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Cecilia González ◽  
◽  
Mario Sezin ◽  
Juan C Ibañez
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Membrane Thickness ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Tomographic Images ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Mucosa

Objective: To evaluate the thickness of the maxillary sinus mucosa before and after performing the elevation of the maxillary sinus floor in partially and very edentulous patients in the posterior sector using cone beam computed tomography images. Methods: Pre and postsurgical tomographic images of 31 cases were included; 24 of which were a unilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure, while 7 cases involved both pneumatic cavities. Measurements were taken at the sagittal and coronal planes. All of them, perpendicular to the sinus mucosa. A retrospective analysis of cone beam computed tomography was performed and the groups were compared with the Wilcoxon test for related samples and the variables graft size, preoperative membrane thickness, age and gender with multivariate analysis. Setting the level of statistical significance p <0.05. Results: A great variability of the thickness of the sinus membrane was confirmed, both in the pre-operative and in the post-operative. It was observed that the mean values in millimeters obtained in the pre-op were 1.45 and 1.12 in the post-op. The medians showed that the membrane thickness values are more atypical and more extreme in the preoperative values (0.79) than in the postoperative values (0.94), which are more normal and uniform. Conclusion: Under the conditions analyzed, there was an absence of changes in the dimensions of the sinus mucosa in the pre and postoperative period of the tomographic images, highlighting evidence of great inter-individual variability.

scholarly journals Accuracy of linear measurements obtained from stitched cone beam computed tomography images versus direct skull measurements

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
Doaa Ahmed Fouad Hamed ◽  
Reham Mohamed Hamdy ◽  
Sahar Hosny El Dessouky
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Lateral Plane ◽  
Skull Measurements ◽  
Human Skulls

Background: To assess whether the linear measurements obtained from stitched cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were as accurate as the direct skull measurements. Methods: Nine dry human skulls were marked with gutta-percha at reference points to obtain Twenty-two linear measurements on each skull. Ten measurements in the cranio-caudal plane, two measurements in the antero-posterior plane, and ten measurements in the medio-lateral plane. CBCT linear measurements obtained using stitching software were measured and compared with direct skull measurements. Results: The absolute Dahlberg error between direct linear measurements and linear measurements on stitched CBCT images ranged from (0.07 mm to 0.41 mm). The relative Dahlberg error ranged from (0.2% to 1.8%). Moreover, Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from (0.97 to 1.0) indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: Stitched CBCT linear measurements were highly comparable to the direct skull measurements using a digital caliper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document