Accuracy of Schneiderian membrane thickness: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis with histological validation

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Insua ◽  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Hsun-Liang Chan ◽  
Nouf Zimmo ◽  
Lujain Shaikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Membrane Thickness ◽  
Schneiderian Membrane ◽  
Tomography Analysis ◽  
Histological Validation

scholarly journals Schneiderian membrane thickness variation following endodontic procedures: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thera Van Den Munckhof ◽  
Shanon Patel ◽  
Garrit Koller ◽  
Erwin Berkhout ◽  
Francesco Mannocci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Thickness Variation ◽  
Membrane Thickness ◽  
Schneiderian Membrane

scholarly journals The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Diagnostics of Cystic Masses of the Jaw

2017 ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
M. A. Batova
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Incisive Canal ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Cystic Masses ◽  
Cbct Analysis ◽  
Tomography Analysis

Research objective. The study aimed to evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) capabilities in diagnostics of cystic masses of the jaw.Methods. Over a period of 2015–2016 32 patients age 6 to 67 underwent both panoramic tomography and CBCT (using panoramic tomographic scanner STRATO 2000 and cone-beam computed tomographic scanner i-Cat respectively). 47% (n = 15) of the participants were women, 53% (n = 17) – men. Radiation exposure for a single procedure amounts to 0,05 mSv for panoramic tomography, 0,07 mSv for CBCT (FOV =13 cm), 0,06 mSv for CBCT (FOV =8 cm).Results. Comparative analysis of obtained results demonstrates that CBCT showed 54% (n = 27) more cystic masses of the jaws than panoramic radiography could. CBCT additionally showed the following pathologies: granulomas smaller than4 mm diameter – 85% (n = 23), 83% (n = 23) of said granulomas were found on maxilla, radicular cysts of maxilla – 11% (n = 3), incisive canal cyst – 4% (n = 1). Additionally panoramic tomography analysis misdiagnosed 5 granulomas (80% (n = 4) on mandibular premolar and molar areas) that were not found during CBCT analysis.Conclusion. The low effective dose and high informativity of CBCT enables the method to be used instead of intraoral radiography, panoramic tomography and MSCT as a screening procedure in diagnostics of dento-facial system pathologies, including cystic masses of the jaw. 

scholarly journals A C-Shaped Canal in a Maxillary Second Molar: Prexion 3D Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-358
Author(s):  
Daniela Siqueira Lopes ◽  
Andréa Cruz Câmara ◽  
Carlos Menezes Aguiar ◽  
Monikelly do Carmo Chagas do Nascimento ◽  
Luciane Farias de Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Tomography Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document