A prospective randomised trial of LigaSure Small Jaw®versusconventional neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.-J. Lin ◽  
C.-C. Wang ◽  
R.-S. Jiang ◽  
Y.-C. Huang ◽  
H.-C. Ho ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Wan-Yu Chen ◽  
Tseng-Cheng Chen ◽  
Shih-Fan Lai ◽  
Tony Hsiang-Kuang Liang ◽  
Bing-Shen Huang ◽  
...  

Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are lacking. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. 93 N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT can achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Cautions should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1354-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ahlberg ◽  
Alexander Ahlberg ◽  
Magnus Lagerlund ◽  
Freddi Lewin ◽  
Signe Friesland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document