scholarly journals In love and war: The morphometric and phylogenetic basis of ornamentation, and the evolution of male display behavior, in the livebearer genusPoecilia

Evolution ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 360-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Goldberg ◽  
Joseph A. Landy ◽  
Joseph Travis ◽  
Mark S. Springer ◽  
David N. Reznick

Ethology ◽  
2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Swierk ◽  
Tracy Langkilde




2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Ryder ◽  
Brent M. Horton ◽  
Ignacio T. Moore

Male reproductive coalitions, in which males cooperate to attract females, are a rare strategy among vertebrates. While some studies have investigated ultimate aspects of these relationships, little is known about the mechanistic role that hormones play in modulating cooperative behaviours. Here, we examined male testosterone variation in a tropical lekking bird, the wire-tailed manakin ( Pipra filicauda ), which exhibits cooperative male–male display coalitions. We found that testosterone levels in territorial males were comparable to those of temperate breeding birds, a surprising result given their environmental, social and reproductive dynamics. In addition, social status rather than plumage was a strong predictor of testosterone variation. Territorial males had significantly higher testosterone levels than did two other plumage classes of floater males, who do not hold territories. We hypothesize that testosterone variation plays an important role in the establishment of male dominance hierarchies (competition), while concurrently facilitating stable display partnerships (cooperation).



2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1600) ◽  
pp. 2324-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. R. Brennan ◽  
Richard O. Prum

Sexual conflict occurs when the evolutionary interests of the sexes differ and it broadly applies to decisions over mating, fertilization and parental investment. Recently, a narrower view of sexual conflict has emerged in which direct selection on females to avoid male-imposed costs during mating is considered the distinguishing feature of conflict, while indirect selection is considered negligible. In this view, intersexual selection via sensory bias is seen as the most relevant mechanism by which male traits that harm females evolve, with antagonistic coevolution between female preferences and male manipulation following. Under this narrower framework, female preference and resistance have been synonymized because both result in a mating bias, and similarly male display and coercion are not distinguished. Our recent work on genital evolution in waterfowl has highlighted problems with this approach. In waterfowl, preference and resistance are distinct components of female phenotype, and display and coercion are independent male strategies. Female preference for male displays result in mate choice, while forced copulations by unpreferred males result in resistance to prevent these males from achieving matings and fertilizations. Genital elaborations in female waterfowl appear to function in reinforcing female preference to maintain the indirect benefits of choice rather than to reduce the direct costs of coercive mating. We propose a return to a broader view of conflict where indirect selection and intrasexual selection are considered important in the evolution of conflict.





2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1296-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Alonso ◽  
Marina Magaña ◽  
Jose M. Álvarez-Martínez




2019 ◽  
pp. 259-287
Author(s):  
Michele A. Johnson ◽  
Ellee G. Cook ◽  
Bonnie K. Kircher
Keyword(s):  


2017 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Chelsea M. Stehle ◽  
Andrew C. Battles ◽  
Michelle N. Sparks ◽  
Michele A. Johnson


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (65) ◽  
pp. 261-278
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Moro ◽  
Esteban Freidin ◽  
Fernando Tohmé

In some economic games, participants systematically display behavior that departs from the model of payoff maximization, and this is usually attributed to social preferences. In this paper we focus on a new interactive context, a mixed-motive game called "Alternative Traveler's Dilemma" (ATD). In this context, most participants choose strictly dominated strategies. Preliminary studies suggest the reason for such a tendency is that participants have social preferences, usually competitive in nature. The question is whether some cognitive factors should also be included in models that account for the tendency at stake. More specifically, we investigate whether participants neglect payoff maximization, that is, whether they fail to notice that, by pursuing some competitive goal, they are not maximizing their payoffs. We report the results of an experiment that supports this hypothesis. We conclude that in order to explain anomalous behavior in the ATD, and similar games, we need to study the cognitive factors that bound participants' strategies and understanding of the game.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document