MARKING TIME AND WRITING HISTORIES

MOHAMMED S. ALI

doi:10.1111/hith.12206

Marking Time? (On the Book by O. Shkaratan “Russian Order: The Vector of Changes”)

Voprosy Ekonomiki ◽

10.32609/0042-8736-2005-9-149-152 ◽

2005 ◽

pp. 149-152

Author(s):

L. Grebnev

Keyword(s):

Marking Time

.

Chinese Industrial Cooperatives Marking Time

Far Eastern Survey ◽

10.1525/as.1941.10.18.01p1029u ◽

1941 ◽

Vol 10 (18) ◽

pp. 208-213

Author(s):

Members of the American Council Staff

Keyword(s):

Marking Time

Review: Marking Time: Romanticism and Evolution edited by Joel Faflak

Nineteenth-Century Literature ◽

10.1525/ncl.2019.74.2.259 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 74 (2) ◽

pp. 259-263

Author(s):

Fuson Wang

Keyword(s):

Marking Time

Marking Time on the Early Modern: Kings, Conquests, Commune, Continuum

Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association ◽

10.2979/jottturstuass.7.1.05 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 14

Author(s):

Brummett

Keyword(s):

Early Modern ◽

Marking Time

Vignettes: Marking Time

Science ◽

10.1126/science.259.5091.110 ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 259 (5091) ◽

pp. 110-110

Keyword(s):

Marking Time

Line Dialogues: Marking time and process

Performance Research ◽

10.1080/13528165.2012.728442 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 17 (5) ◽

pp. 54-55

Author(s):

Jane Grisewood ◽

Carali McCall

Keyword(s):

Marking Time

Spatial Effects on Temporal Categorisation

Perception ◽

10.1068/p6165 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 38 (5) ◽

pp. 748-762 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Marie-Ève Roussel ◽

Simon Grondin ◽

Peter Killeen

Keyword(s):

Temporal Processing ◽

Critical Role ◽

Vertical Plane ◽

Spatial Effects ◽

Time Intervals ◽

Spatial Factors ◽

Upper Visual Field ◽

Sensitivity Level ◽

Marking Time ◽

Perceived Duration

We examined the influence of spatial factors in temporal processing. Participants categorised as short or long empty intervals marked by two brief flashes delivered from locations differing in height and depth (experiment 1), or from two of three locations on a vertical plane (experiment 2). The perceived duration of intervals, as determined by the point of subjective equality, was affected by the height and depth of the signals (experiment 1). Experiment 2 showed that the point of fixation plays a critical role in perceived duration. The duration of an interval located in the upper visual field is perceived as longer when participants fixate the higher visual source and shorter when the fixation point is set in the middle; this latter result also generally applies when the fixation point is in the lower source. Finally, for the sensitivity level, there was a significant segment (upper versus lower) × direction (descending versus ascending) interaction in experiment 1; a similar interaction effect varied according to the fixation point in experiment 2. In experiment 2, the Weber fractions were around 0.22. Most results can be explained in terms of the need to shift attention from one visual source—for marking time intervals—to another.