scholarly journals Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae)

2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAY F. STORZ ◽  
J. BALASINGH ◽  
HARI R. BHAT ◽  
P. THIRUCHENTHIL NATHAN ◽  
D. PARAMANANTHA SWAMI DOSS ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Valeria De Olivera-López ◽  
Arley Camargo ◽  
Raúl Maneyro

Intersexual morphological differences within a species occur in many traits, including body size and shape. Many processes that cause geographic variability in morphology have been proposed: population structure, phenotypic plasticity (environmental effects on development), and natural and/or sexual selection. Several hypotheses can explain patterns of sexual dimorphism in anurans, including natural or intra/inter-sexual selection, and differences in life history strategies between sexes. Limnomedusa macroglossa is considered a habitat specialist restricted to rocky outcrops in Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay. We evaluated the extent of sexual (size and shape) dimorphism in L. macroglossa from Uruguay based on morphometrics and secondary sexual characteristics, while taking into account geographic variation. Sexual dimorphism in body size of adults was found, but multivariate analyses did not demonstrate the existence of significant differences in shape. There were also significant differences in body size and hind leg measurements among six hydrographic basins as a result from the phenotypic plasticity correlated with local temperature, representing a clinal variation along the latitudinal gradient of Uruguay. The sexual dimorphism found in body size is probably the consequence of higher growth rates and/or late sexual maturity in females, which favors larger body size for accommodating larger ovaries, and thus, higher reproductive output. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Garvin ◽  
Sabrina B. Sholts ◽  
Laurel A. Mosca
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1352 ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambigapathy Ganesh ◽  
Wieslaw Bogdanowicz ◽  
Moritz Haupt ◽  
Ganapathy Marimuthu ◽  
Koilmani Emmanuvel Rajan

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 119-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Garvin ◽  
Marina C. Elliott ◽  
Lucas K. Delezene ◽  
John Hawks ◽  
Steven E. Churchill ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anbalagan Rathinakumar ◽  
Murugavel Baheerathan ◽  
Barbara A. Caspers ◽  
Joseph J. Erinjery ◽  
Perumalswamy Kaliraj ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Virgl ◽  
Shane P. Mahoney ◽  
Kim Mawhinney

It is well recognized that differences in environmental selection pressures among populations can generate phenotypic divergence in a suite of morphological characteristics and associated life history traits. Previous analysis of mitochondrial DNA and body size have suggested that Black Bears (Ursus americanus) inhabiting the island of Newfoundland represent a different subspecies or ecotype from mainland populations. Assuming that body size covaries positively with skull size, we predicted that skull size would be greater for bears on the island than the mainland, and the distribution of size-related shape components in multivariate space should show a distinct separation between Newfoundland and mainland populations. Measurements of 1080 specimens from Newfoundland, Alberta, New York, and Quebec did not provide unequivocal support for our prediction that skull size in Newfoundland bears would be larger than bears from the mainland populations. After removing ontogenetic effects of skull size, between-population variation in skull shape was greater in females than males, and the analysis significantly separated Newfoundland bears from mainland populations. Explanations for this pattern are numerous, but currently remain hypothetical. Limited covariation between skull size and body size suggests that genetic traits regulating the size of Black Bear skulls are more heritable (i.e., less influenced by environmental selection pressures) than characteristics affecting body size. We hypothesize that if gape size does not limit prey size in solitary terrestrial carnivores, large degrees of among-population variation in body size should be coupled with little covariation in skull size. In general, sexual dimorphism in skull size and shape was marginal for the phenotypic characters measured in our study. We believe that sexual dimorphism in skull size in Black Bears is primarily driven by intrasexual selection in males for increased gape size display, while similarity in skull shape between sexes is associated with the constraints of a temporally-selective, but similar diet.


2004 ◽  
Vol 71 (sup2) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Marzona ◽  
Daniele Seglie ◽  
Cristina Giacoma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document