Trap-shyness in a woodland population of Bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus)

2009 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
George N. A. Bailey
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 924-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert E. Olsson ◽  
Neil White ◽  
Clas Ahlm ◽  
Fredrik Elgh ◽  
Ann-Christin Verlemyr ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 830-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. KALLIO-KOKKO ◽  
J. LAAKKONEN ◽  
A. RIZZOLI ◽  
V. TAGLIAPIETRA ◽  
I. CATTADORI ◽  
...  

The spatial and temporal distribution of hantavirus and arenavirus antibody-positive wild rodents in Trentino, Italy, was studied using immunofluorescence assays (IFA) in two long-term sites trapped in 2000–2003, and six other sites trapped in 2002. The overall hantavirus seroprevalence in the bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus (n=229) screened for Puumala virus (PUUV) antibodies was 0·4%, and that for Apodemus flavicollis mice (n=1416) screened for Dobrava virus (DOBV) antibodies was 0·2%. Antibodies against lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) were found in 82 (5·6%) of the 1472 tested rodents; the seroprevalence being 6·1% in A. flavicollis (n=1181), 3·3% in C. glareolus (n=276), and 14·3% in Microtus arvalis (n=7). Of the serum samples of 488 forestry workers studied by IFA, 12 were LCMV-IgG positive (2·5%) and one DOBV-IgG positive (0·2%), however, the latter could not be confirmed DOBV-specific with a neutralization assay. Our results show a widespread distribution but low prevalence of DOBV in Trentino, and demonstrate that the arenavirus antibodies are a common finding in several other rodent species besides the house mouse.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michŀ Kozakiewicz ◽  
Anna Kozakiewicz ◽  
Aleksy Łukowski ◽  
Tomasz Gortat

1998 ◽  
Vol 244 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Bull ◽  
R. M. Chalmers ◽  
A. P. Sturdee ◽  
T. D. Healing

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 816-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesa Koivunen ◽  
Erkki Korpimäki ◽  
Harri Hakkarainen ◽  
Kai Norrdahl

Errington proposed that predators mainly kill substandard prey, because dominant individuals force subordinate ones into poor habitats, where the predation risk is higher. We studied the prey choice of breeding male Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus funereus) in 1992, when vole densities crashed. We trapped small mammals in the main habitat types in 21 owl territories, and simultaneously identified prey items cached by the same owls in their nest boxes. The main prey of owls in western Finland are the common vole (Microtus epiroticus), field vole (M. agrestis), bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus), and common shrew (Sorex araneus). Common voles were the preferred prey of owls, followed by field voles, bank voles, and common shrews. Prey captured by owls tended to be lighter and smaller than those available in the field. This tendency was significant for field voles and common shrews. Field voles, common voles, and female common shrews captured by owls tended to have more internal fat than those available in the field. This tendency was significant for male field voles and female common shrews. Owls appeared to choose small individuals of some, but not all, prey species, and that these prey items were not in poor physiological condition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document