scholarly journals A Comparison of GlideScope Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy Intubation in the Emergency Department

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 866-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Platts-Mills ◽  
Danielle Campagne ◽  
Brian Chinnock ◽  
Brandy Snowden ◽  
Larry T. Glickman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy

scholarly journals Does Video Laryngoscopy or Direct Laryngoscopy affect first pass success rates for intubation among Attending and Non-Attending Emergency Physician in the Emergency Department?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Weng Wan ◽  
Zakaria Nur Diana ◽  
Seow Gek Ching ◽  
Wong Evelyn
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Lemon Score

Abstract Background: To our knowledge, there has been no study comparing intubation characteristics between attending and non-attending Emergency Physicians in South-East Asia. We aim to identify whether the use of Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) compared to Video Laryngoscopy (VL) affects first pass success rates between Attending Emergency Physicians (AEP) and Non-Attending Emergency Physicians (NAEP). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 2009 to 2016 in an existing airway registry managed by and academic Emergency Department in Singapore. Primary outcome is first pass success intubation rate. The secondary outcome was first pass success rate for difficult intubations. Difficult intubations were defined as LEMON score of more than 1 or more than 1 attempt at intubation. Results: There were 2909 intubation carried out by emergency physicians in the Emergency Department from 2009 to 2016. AEP conducted 1748 intubations while NAEP conducted 1161 intubations. The first pass success rates for AEP was 84.2% while that for NAEP was 67.4%. 86.2% of intubations by AEP were done with a direct laryngoscope. 89.0% of the intubations by NAEP were done with a direct laryngoscope. 18.9% of intubations by the AEP were difficult compared to 35.2% by the NAEP (p<0.01 95% C.I 13.0%-19.6%). First pass success rate with VL was lower than DL for all intubations (OR 0.66, 95% C.I 0.51-0.84). In the subgroup of difficult intubations, VL did not improve first pass success rate among AEP (OR 0.77, 95% C.I 0.38-1.58) but it did for NAEP (OR 2.46, 95% C.I 0.94-6.45). Conclusion: Our study showed that VL has a poorer first pass success rate for all intubations in general. However, specifically for difficult intubations, VL is associated with improved first pass success rates among NAEP.

scholarly journals Does video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy affect first-pass success rates for intubation among attending and non-attending emergency physicians in the emergency department?

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792091063
Author(s):  
Wan Paul Weng ◽  
Nur Diana Bte Zakaria ◽  
Seow Gek Ching ◽  
Evelyn Wong
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Mallampati Score ◽  
First Pass

Background: To our knowledge, there has been no study comparing intubation characteristics between attending and non-attending emergency physicians in Southeast Asia. We aim to identify whether the use of direct laryngoscopy compared to video laryngoscopy affects first-pass success rates between attending emergency physicians and non-attending emergency physicians. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 2009 to 2016 in an existing airway registry managed by an academic Emergency Department in Singapore. Primary outcome was first-pass success intubation rate. Secondary outcome was first-pass success rate for difficult intubations. Difficult intubations were defined as LEMON (Look externally, Evaluate 3-3-2 rule, Mallampati score, Obstruction, Neck mobility) score of more than 1. Results: There were a total of 2909 intubations. Attending emergency physicians conducted 1748 intubations, while non-attending emergency physicians conducted 1161 intubations. The first-pass success rates for AEP were 84.2% and 67.4% for non-attending emergency physicians. Direct laryngoscopy was used in 86.2% of intubation by attending emergency physicians compared to 89.0% in the intubation by non-attending emergency physicians. Also, 7.6% of intubations by the attending emergency physicians were difficult compared to 8.8% by the non-attending emergency physicians (p = 0.25). Logistic regression of the effect of laryngoscopy device on first-pass success in all intubations showed a negative association with video laryngoscopy (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.88). In the subgroup of difficult intubations, non-attending emergency physicians are 1.54 times (95% confidence interval, 0.53–4.42) as likely to have first-pass success with video laryngoscopy compared to that with direct laryngoscopy. On the contrary, in the subgroup of difficult intubations, attending emergency physicians are 0.90 times (95% confidence interval, 0.38–2.12) as likely to have first-pass success with video laryngoscopy compared to that with direct laryngoscopy. Conclusion: Our study showed that video laryngoscopy has a lower first-pass success rate for all intubations in general. Intubations performed by attending emergency physicians with direct laryngoscopy were associated with a higher first-pass success rate.

Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry ( NEAR ) Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin A. Brown ◽  
Amy H. Kaji ◽  
Andrea Fantegrossi ◽  
Jestin N. Carlson ◽  
Michael D. April ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Video Laryngoscopy ◽  
Emergency Airway ◽  
National Emergency
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document