PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING AND FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: A TESTING PROGRAM THAT DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE

1974 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN B. MINER
Signs ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Quinn ◽  
Carol A. Smith

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huong Le ◽  
Catrina Palmer Johnson ◽  
Yuka Fujimoto

PurposeThis article examines a climate for inclusion through the lens of organizational justice. We argue that open interpersonal contacts, the fair treatment of gender-diverse employees, and inclusive decision-making processes in the promotion of equitable employment practices are foundational for shaping the climate for inclusion.Design/methodology/approachQualitative data were collected from multi sources: focus groups with female employees (N = 20) and interviews with male and female managers (N = 8).FindingsIn examining the similarities and differences between employees' and managers' perspectives, the findings revealed that, in all dimensions of a climate for inclusion, employees had more negative justice concerns than did managers, while managers and employees had similar views on some aspects of employment practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was conducted within one university setting; therefore, the findings may not be applicable to other industries.Practical implicationsThis study offers managerial implications that can be developed to promote the climate for inclusion in organizations.Social implicationsIn order to create a fair and equitable workplace, all employees should be able to actively participate in decision-making processes and share suggestions for contextualized and fair employment practices.Originality/valueDrawing the group-value model, this study advocates the importance of justice-based organizational practices in building an inclusive organization.


1986 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Julius L. Chambers ◽  
Barry Goldstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document