scholarly journals A critical realist evaluation of advance care planning in care homes

Author(s):  
Adam Spacey ◽  
Janet Scammell ◽  
Michele Board ◽  
Sam Porter
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201.1-201
Author(s):  
Margaret Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Keri Thomas ◽  
Lucy Giles

Author(s):  
Maggie Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Mandy Thorn

This chapter describes the care home setting, aspects that have an impact on use of Advance care planning (ACP) in care homes, examples of challenges and best practice, use of ACP in the GSF Care Homes Training Programme, ACP with people with dementia, and culture change. Many people in care homes are in the last year/s of life, and ACP discussions are especially important for them to ensure that the care they receive is in line with what they want. Care homes lead the way in their extensive use of ACP discussions. ACP is more routinely used by care home staff than is often recognized, and can be easier to introduce in care homes than in other settings. Key challenges include poor means of communication due to dementia/cognitive impairment or physical deterioration, and how staff address the expectations of families, and ensure any interventions are in the best interests of the person.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237796082110518
Author(s):  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
Tamara Sussman ◽  
Maria Nicula ◽  
Jack Lawrence ◽  
Genevieve Thompson ◽  
...  

Introduction Advance care planning can improve the quality of life for residents in long-term care homes and reduce stress for families. However, care home staff and families often lack knowledge about advance care planning, making it especially difficult for residents with dementia to communicate their care plan wishes. A Conversation Starter Kit may increase advance care planning awareness among staff and families. Objectives This study evaluated an advance care planning intervention, the Conversation Starter Kit booklet, for use in long term care homes. Methods Data were collected at three long-term care homes in southern Ontario. We collected data from 55 residents who were able to make decisions on their own paired with 11 family members of these residents. We also collected data from 24 family members of residents who were unable to make decisions on their own. This study used a quasi-experimental, one group pre/post design. Quantitative surveys were administered before and after a three-month advance care planning intervention. An additional structured interview was completed at the end of the intervention period, which included both closed and open-ended questions to assess perceptions about the booklet's use or non-use. Results Residents reported more engagement in advance care planning after completing the Conversation Starter Kit booklet, particularly related to asking questions to health care providers about health care decisions. Family members reported feeling very certain that they would be able to make decisions on behalf of the resident but felt less certain after completing the booklet, implying the booklet raised their awareness of the types of decisions they might need to make, hopefully prompting them to be more prepared for decisions in the future. Conclusions An advance care planning intervention – The Conversation Starter Kit booklet - appears acceptable and easy to use for residents and family members/friends in long-term care and can improve resident engagement in advance care planning. Although using the booklet may decrease efficacy for decision making among family members of long-term care residents, it may highlight the importance of more actionable engagement in advance care planning among residents, their families/friends, and staff.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Ramsbottom ◽  
Mary Lou Kelley

Long term care (LTC) homes, also known as residential care homes, commonly care for residents until death, making palliative care and advance care planning (ACP) important elements of care. However, limited research exists on ACP in LTC. In particular, research giving voice to family members and substitute decision makers is lacking. The objective of this research was to understand experiences, perspectives, and preferences to guide quality improvement of ACP in LTC. This qualitative descriptive study conducted 34 individual semistructured interviews in two LTC homes, located in Canada. The participants were 31 family members and three staff, consisting of a front line care worker, a registered nurse, and a nurse practitioner. All participants perceived ACP conversations as valuable to provide “resident-centred care”; however, none of the participants had a good understanding of ACP, limiting its effectiveness. Strategies generated through the research to improve ACP were as follows: educating families and staff on ACP and end-of-life care options; better preparing staff for ACP conversations; providing staff skills training and guidelines; and LTC staff initiating systematic, proactive conversations using careful timing. These strategies can guide quality improvement of palliative care and development of ACP tools and resources specific to the LTC home sector.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances J Badger ◽  
Karen L Shaw ◽  
Alistair Hewison ◽  
Collette Clifford ◽  
Keri Thomas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document