Capability Estimation of Geometrical Tolerance With a Material Modifier by a Hasofer–Lind Index

Author(s):  
Antoine S. Tahan ◽  
Jason Cauvier

This paper considers a way of measuring a process capability index in order to obtain the geometric tolerance of a pattern of position elements according to the ASME Y14.5 standard. The number of elements present in the pattern, as well as its material condition (least LMC or maximum MMC), are taken into consideration during the analysis. An explicit mathematical model will be developed to identify the distribution functions (PDF and CDF) of defects on the location and diameter. Using these distributions and the Hasofer–Lind index, we will arrive at a new definition of process capability—meaning the value of tolerances that can meet the threshold of x% compliance. Finally, our method is validated using a variety of typical case studies.

2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 1456-1459
Author(s):  
Shuang Zhang ◽  
Jin Gang Gao

This paper focuses on process capability evaluation method for position tolerance under maximum material condition. Due to application of maximum material condition the position tolerance specification varies individually for each part, the approach of percentage normalization is introduced to calculate position process capability index. Bush is taken as an example, and true position percentage normalization of 30 parts are calculated. Considering the true position constitution relative to position tolerance at maximum material condition, related individual percentages are used to express the result and the same tolerance size 100% is obtained as for a unilateral tolerance. Process Capability index is calculated with Minitab software.


2014 ◽  
Vol 945-949 ◽  
pp. 107-110
Author(s):  
Shuang Zhang ◽  
Jin Gang Gao ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Xiao Qing Zhang

Process capability prediction methods for position tolerance under maximum material condition were discussed in this paper. Due to application of maximum material condition the position tolerance specification varied individually for each part, percentage normalization and minimum gap methods were introduced to calculate the position process capability index. Link was taken as an example, true position percentage normalization and minimum gap of 30 parts were calculated. Considering the true position constitution relative to position tolerance at maximum material condition, related individual percentages were used to express the result and the same tolerance size 100% was obtained as for a unilateral tolerance. Set the acceptable value was 0, minimum gap between a hole and a simulated position gauge pin is studied instead of position. The process capability prediction results of two methods were calculated by Minitab software.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aslam ◽  
N. Khan ◽  
Liaquat Ahmad ◽  
Chi-Hyuck Jun ◽  
Jaffer Hussain

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 4565-4573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kashif ◽  
Muhammad Aslam ◽  
G. Srinivasa Rao ◽  
Ali Hussein AL-Marshadi ◽  
Chi-Hyuck Jun

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios Alevizakos ◽  
Christos Koukouvinos ◽  
Philippe Castagliola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document