Accelerated Industrial Blade Design Based on Multi-Objective Optimization Using Surrogate Model Methodology

Author(s):  
A. Keskin ◽  
M. Swoboda ◽  
P. M. Flassig ◽  
A. K. Dutta ◽  
D. Bestle

The intention of this paper is to provide an advanced aerodynamic blade design approach for industrial purposes which are basically characterized by limited development time, human and computing resources. From the industrial point of view, the demand for process acceleration and design optimization cannot be sufficiently satisfied with traditional human-based design methods. Recent investigations on blade optimization have shown some potential in performance improvements, however, this is typically obtained by high computational efforts in particular when using multi-objective optimization methods. In order to combine the benefits of numerical optimization with the requirements of industrial needs for design acceleration, a new automated blade optimization strategy is required. The accelerated industrial blade design process in this paper is based on a three-dimensional parameterization approach using non-dimensional parameter distributions which always guarantee desired blade geometry smoothness. In order to approximate the design objectives and constraints, a response surface methodology is applied where the design parameter variation is obtained by the quasi-random SOBOL sequence. Based on that, a highly sophisticated multi-objective genetic algorithm is used with reasonable numbers for individuals and generations for solving the contradicting design goals of an aerodynamic blade design problem by considering multiple aerodynamic and geometric constraints. This approach offers a set of non-dominated solutions on the Pareto-front which are subsequently evaluated with the exact flow analysis. In case of objective function value discrepancies between model and exact evaluations, an update of the surrogate model is performed including these additional solutions until the approximation response is equivalent to the exact analysis within a predefined tolerance. This new methodology shows a significant overall design time reduction particularly a decrease of required function evaluations without loosing the benefit of multi-objective optimization in providing Pareto-optimal solutions. Based on a typical industrial compressor test case, an aerodynamic performance improvement and process acceleration by factor greater than 10 could be achieved.

Energy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 681-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfei Cui ◽  
Zhiqiang Geng ◽  
Qunxiong Zhu ◽  
Yongming Han

Author(s):  
Lars Moberg ◽  
Gianfranco Guidati ◽  
Sasha Savic

This paper focuses on (1) the basic compressor layout based on meridional through flow analysis and (2) the re-design of blades and vanes using sophisticated automated design optimization methods. All tools and processes are integrated into a consistent Compressor Design System, which runs on a powerful Linux cluster. This design system allows designing, analyzing and documenting blade design in mostly automated way. This frees the engineer from repetitive tasks and allows him to concentrate on a physical understanding and improvement of the compressor. The tools and methods are illustrated on the basis of an actual ALSTOM compressor. The main objectives of this upgrade are a modest increase in mass flow and an efficiency improvement. The latter is to be achieved through the replacement of NACA blades by modern Controlled Diffusion Airfoils (CDA). Results are presented including a CFD analysis of the front stages of the baseline and upgrade compressor.


Author(s):  
Sirwan Ghavami ◽  
Mohammad-Hasan Khademi ◽  
Farkhondeh Hemmati ◽  
Ali Fazeli ◽  
Jamshid Mohammadi-Roshandeh

Author(s):  
Luying Zhang ◽  
Gabriel Davila ◽  
Mehrdad Zangeneh

Abstract This paper presents three different multi-objective optimization strategies for a high specific speed centrifugal volute pump design. The objectives of the optimization consist of maximizing the efficiency and minimizing the cavitation while maintaining the Euler head. The first two optimization strategies use a 3D inverse design method to parametrize the blade geometry. Both meridional shape and 3D blade geometry is changed during the optimization. In the first approach Design of Experiment method is used and the efficiency computed from CFD computations, while cavitation is evaluated by using minimum pressure on blade surface predicted by 3D inverse design method. The design matrix is then used to create a surrogate model where optimization is run to find the best tradeoff between cavitation and efficiency. This optimized geometry is manufactured and tested and is found to be 3.9% more efficient than the baseline with little cavitation at high flow. In the second approach the 3D inverse design method output is used to compute the efficiency and cavitation parameters and this leads to considerable reduction to the computational time. The resulting optimized geometry is found to be similar to the more computationally expensive solution based on 3D CFD results. In order to compare the inverse design based optimization to the conventional optimization an equivalent optimization is carried out by parametrizing the blade angle and meridional shape. Two different approaches are used for conventional optimization one in which the blade angle at TE is not constrained and one in which blade angles are constrained. In both cases larger variation in head is obtained when compared with the inverse design approach. This makes it impossible to create an accurate surrogate model. Furthermore, the efficiency levels in the conventional optimization is generally lower than the inverse design based optimization.


Author(s):  
Masahide Matsumoto ◽  
Jumpei Abe ◽  
Masataka Yoshimura

Abstract Generally, two types of priorities are considered among multiple objectives in the design of machine structures. One of these objectives is named the “hard objective”, which is the absolutely indispensable design requirement. The other is called the “soft objective”, which has lower priority order. This paper proposes a multi-objective structural optimization strategy with priority ranking of those design objectives. Further, this strategy is demonstrated on the actual example of a motorcycle frame structural design which has three design objectives, (1) an increase in static torsional rigidity, (2) a reduction of dynamic response level, and (3) a decrease in the weight of the motorcycle frame.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document