Rail surface defect detection based on deep learning

Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Li ◽  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Hu Chen
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-442
Author(s):  
Jiang Hua Feng ◽  
Hao Yuan ◽  
Yun Qing Hu ◽  
Jun Lin ◽  
Shi Wang Liu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 101501
Author(s):  
沈晓海 Shen Xiaohai ◽  
栗泽昊 Li Zehao ◽  
李敏 Li Min ◽  
徐晓龙 Xu Xiaolong ◽  
张学武 Zhang Xuewu

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1266-1273
Author(s):  
Feyza Cerezci ◽  
Serap Kazan ◽  
Muhammed Ali Oz ◽  
Cemil Oz ◽  
Tugrul Tasci ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Weidong Zhao ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Hancheng Huang ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
Wei Cheng

In recent years, more and more scholars devoted themselves to the research of the target detection algorithm due to the continuous development of deep learning. Among them, the detection and recognition of small and complex targets are still a problem to be solved. The authors of this article have understood the shortcomings of the deep learning detection algorithm in detecting small and complex defect targets and would like to share a new improved target detection algorithm in steel surface defect detection. The steel surface defects will affect the quality of steel seriously. We find that most of the current detection algorithms for NEU-DET dataset detection accuracy are low, so we choose to verify a steel surface defect detection algorithm based on machine vision on this dataset for the problem of defect detection in steel production. A series of improvement measures are carried out in the traditional Faster R-CNN algorithm, such as reconstructing the network structure of Faster R-CNN. Based on the small features of the target, we train the network with multiscale fusion. For the complex features of the target, we replace part of the conventional convolution network with a deformable convolution network. The experimental results show that the deep learning network model trained by the proposed method has good detection performance, and the mean average precision is 0.752, which is 0.128 higher than the original algorithm. Among them, the average precision of crazing, inclusion, patches, pitted surface, rolled in scale and scratches is 0.501, 0.791, 0.792, 0.874, 0.649, and 0.905, respectively. The detection method is able to identify small target defects on the steel surface effectively, which can provide a reference for the automatic detection of steel defects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document