Using cortical vessels for patient registration during image-guided neurosurgery: a phantom study

Author(s):  
Hai Sun ◽  
David W. Roberts ◽  
Alex Hartov ◽  
Kyle R. Rick ◽  
Keith D. Paulsen
2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P143-P144
Author(s):  
Nozomu Matsumoto ◽  
Jaesung Hong ◽  
Hashizume Makoto ◽  
Shizuo Komune

Objectives 1) Develop a less invasive but accurate enough registration strategy for otological surgical navigation. 2) Evaluate the new system in phantom study. 3) Evaluate the new system in cochlear implant surgeries. Methods A new registration method was developed for otologic surgery. Previously, the registration for accurate image-guided surgery often required invasive fiducial markers attached on patient's bone. We utilized the template of the bone surface to transfer the pre-made virtual bone-anchored markers to the patient's bone intraoperatively and eliminated the necessity for preoperative marker positioning or preoperative additional CT scan. Results We tested this Surface Template-Assisted Marker Positioning (STAMP) method using 5 temporal bone replicas, and in 5 ear surgeries (2 cochlear implants, 3 translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgeries) to investigate whether this method improves, or at least retains, the accuracy of image- guided surgery (IGS). The fiducial registration errors and target registration errors in the phantom study was ∼0.7 mm and ∼1.5 mm, respectively. The target registration errors in replicas were always less than 2 mm. In actual ear surgeries the fiducial registration errors were ∼0.6 mm and the target registration errors were less than 2 mm in 4 of 5 surgeries. All patients received successful cochlear implantation or tumor removal. Conclusions The new method reduced the preoperative procedures for patients but did not reduce the accuracy of the surgical navigation. Our method would be a useful IGS method in the field of otology where both accuracy and non-invasiveness are required.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhadra Srinivasan ◽  
Matthew V. Schulmerich ◽  
Brian W. Pogue ◽  
Michael D. Morris

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunliang Cai ◽  
Jonathan D. Olson ◽  
Xiaoyao Fan ◽  
Linton T. Evans ◽  
Keith D. Paulsen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 188-196
Author(s):  
Hsiang‐Chi Kuo ◽  
Michael M. Lovelock ◽  
Guang Li ◽  
Åse Ballangrud ◽  
Brian Wolthuis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 6570-6582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouya Jelvehgaran ◽  
Tanja Alderliesten ◽  
Jelmer J. A. Weda ◽  
Martijn de Bruin ◽  
Dirk J. Faber ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Cardinale ◽  
Michele Rizzi ◽  
Piergiorgio d’Orio ◽  
Giuseppe Casaceli ◽  
Gabriele Arnulfo ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of Neurolocate frameless registration system and frame-based registration for robotic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).METHODSThe authors performed a 40-trajectory phantom laboratory study and a 127-trajectory retrospective analysis of a surgical series. The laboratory study was aimed at testing the noninferiority of the Neurolocate system. The analysis of the surgical series compared Neurolocate-based SEEG implantations with a frame-based historical control group.RESULTSThe mean localization errors (LE) ± standard deviations (SD) for Neurolocate-based and frame-based trajectories were 0.67 ± 0.29 mm and 0.76 ± 0.34 mm, respectively, in the phantom study (p = 0.35). The median entry point LE was 0.59 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0.25–0.88 mm) for Neurolocate-registration–based trajectories and 0.78 mm (IQR 0.49–1.08 mm) for frame-registration–based trajectories (p = 0.00002) in the clinical study. The median target point LE was 1.49 mm (IQR 1.06–2.4 mm) for Neurolocate-registration–based trajectories and 1.77 mm (IQR 1.25–2.5 mm) for frame-registration–based trajectories in the clinical study. All the surgical procedures were successful and uneventful.CONCLUSIONSThe results of the phantom study demonstrate the noninferiority of Neurolocate frameless registration. The results of the retrospective surgical series analysis suggest that Neurolocate-based procedures can be more accurate than the frame-based ones. The safety profile of Neurolocate-based registration should be similar to that of frame-based registration. The Neurolocate system is comfortable, noninvasive, easy to use, and potentially faster than other registration devices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document