Free‐Field Measurements on Jet Engines

1954 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 938-939
Author(s):  
D. M. A. Mercer
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Jet Engines

Substructure methods for impact systems: Comparison with free field measurements

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145
Author(s):  
Th. Neidhart ◽  
J. Grabe ◽  
G. Huber
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Field Measurements

Free field measurements of the absorption coefficient for nonlocally reacting sound absorbing porous layers

2002 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 1327-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Jansens ◽  
W. Lauriks ◽  
G. Vermeir ◽  
J. F. Allard
Keyword(s):  
Absorption Coefficient ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Porous Layers

The Implementation of Time Selective Technique for Simulated Free-Field Measurements to Loudspeaker Characterization

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio G. Ferraz ◽  
Marco Castro ◽  
Valdinei Sczibor ◽  
Juliano Medeiros ◽  
Leonardo Faria
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Selective Technique

Detailed analysis of permanent magnets by means of free field measurements

2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (17) ◽  
pp. 17E302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Husstedt ◽  
Manfred Kaltenbacher
Keyword(s):  
Detailed Analysis ◽  
Permanent Magnets ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Field Measurements

Effect of Loudspeaker Position on Differences between Earphone and Free-Field Thresholds (MAP and MAF)

1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Stream ◽  
Donald D. Dirks
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Ear Canal ◽  
Pure Tones ◽  
Calibration Techniques

Free-field and earphone measurements were obtained from eight practiced listeners under monaural and binaural conditions to assess the hypothesis that a major source of the disparity between minimum audible pressure (MAP) and minimum audible field (MAF) speech thresholds was the position of the loudspeaker relative to the listener’s head. Free-field measurements were made at seven different loudspeaker positions (0, 30, 60, 90, 270, 300, and 330 degrees). Stimuli were spondaic words and pure tones at five octave intervals from 250 to 4000 Hz. The smallest monaural MAP/MAF difference for spondees occurred at 0° azimuth (2.7 dB) and the largest appeared at the 60° near-ear position (7.1 dB). Similar results emerged for spondaic words under binaural conditions, although the magnitude of the changes due to variations in loudspeaker position was reduced considerably from comparable monaural conditions. These results indicated that the disparities in MAP/MAF differences of previous investigations were due principally to the location of the loudspeaker. The differences between MAP and MAF thresholds were compared to other published results on ear-canal pressure measured in free field and under earphone. Secondary analysis of the data suggests that the MAP/MAF differences observed in this study may be related partially to the differences in calibration techniques used to specify the level of the signal in free field and under earphone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document