scholarly journals Talker variability and token variability in spoken word recognition: Effects on repetition priming in lexical decision and an explicit recognition memory task

1995 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 3362-3362
Author(s):  
Emily A. Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Spoken Word Recognition ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Spoken Word ◽  
Recognition Memory Task ◽  
Talker Variability ◽  
Explicit Recognition

scholarly journals Spoken word recognition with gender-marked context

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Spinelli ◽  
Fanny Meunier ◽  
Alix Seigneuric
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Spoken Word Recognition ◽  
Spoken Word ◽  
Phonological Priming ◽  
Phonological Information ◽  
Gender Information

In a cross-modal (auditory-visual) fragment priming study in French, we tested the hypothesis that gender information given by a gender-marked article (e.g. unmasculine or unefeminine) is used early in the recognition of the following word to discard gender-incongruent competitors. In four experiments, we compared lexical decision performances on targets primed by phonological information only (e.g. /kRa/-CRAPAUD /kRapo/; /to/-TOAD) or by phonological plus gender information given by a gender-marked article (e.g. unmasculine /kra/-CRAPAUD; a /to/-TOAD). In all experiments, we found a phonological priming effect that was not modulated by the presence of gender context, whether gender-marked articles were congruent (Experiments 1, 2, and 3) or incongruent (Experiment 4) with the target gender. Moreover, phonological facilitation was not modulated by the presence of gender context, whether gender-marked articles allowed exclusion of less frequent competitors (Experiment 1) or more frequent ones (Experiments 2 and 3). We concluded that gender information extracted from a preceding gender-marked determiner is not used early in the process of spoken word recognition and that it may be used in a later selection process.

Visual and Auditory Recognition of Prefixed Words

1986 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Taft ◽  
Gail Hambly ◽  
Sachiko Kinoshita
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Lexical Decision ◽  
Spoken Word Recognition ◽  
Spoken Word ◽  
Cohort Model ◽  
Auditory Recognition ◽  
Prefixed Words ◽  
Visual Lexical Decision

The involvement of stem storage and prefix stripping in the recognition of spoken and printed prefixed words was examined. In both an auditory and a visual lexical decision experiment, it was found that prefixed nonwords were more difficult to classify as nonwords than were non-prefixed nonwords. This difference was larger, though, when the “stem” of the nonword was a genuine stem in English (e.g., dejoice versus tejoice) than when it was not (e.g., dejouse versus tejouse). The results suggest that prefixed words are recognized via a representation of their stem after the prefix has been removed, and this is true regardless of the modality of presentation of the word. Implications are considered for the Cohort model of spoken word recognition.

Phase/amplitude reset and theta-gamma interaction in the human medial temporal lobe during a continuous word recognition memory task

Hippocampus ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 890-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Mormann ◽  
Juergen Fell ◽  
Nikolai Axmacher ◽  
Bernd Weber ◽  
Klaus Lehnertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Temporal Lobe ◽  
Medial Temporal Lobe ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Recognition Memory Task ◽  
Phase Amplitude

Effects of lexical and talker variability factors on spoken word recognition in native and non‐native, normal and hearing‐impaired listeners

2000 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 2602-2603
Author(s):  
Sumiko Takayanagi ◽  
Donald D. Dirks ◽  
Anahita Moshfegh ◽  
P. Douglas Noffsinger ◽  
Stephen A. Fausti
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Spoken Word Recognition ◽  
Spoken Word ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Talker Variability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document