Effect of rhythm-based prediction on medial olivocochlear reflex and delta oscillations

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. A106-A106
Author(s):  
Yuki Ishizaka ◽  
Sho Otsuka ◽  
Seiji Nakagawa
2021 ◽  
pp. 108246
Author(s):  
Miriam I. Marrufo-Pérez ◽  
Leire Araquistain-Serrat ◽  
Almudena Eustaquio-Martín ◽  
Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 784-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdem Eren ◽  
Ece Harman ◽  
Seçil Arslanoğlu ◽  
Kazm Önal ◽  
Hüseyin Katlmiş

2014 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 754-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Abdala ◽  
Sumitrajit Dhar ◽  
Mahnaz Ahmadi ◽  
Ping Luo

Author(s):  
Shawn Goodman ◽  
Sriram Boothalingam ◽  
Jeffery T Lichtenhan

Functional outcomes of medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) activation, such as improved hearing in background noise and protection from noise damage, involve moderate to high sound levels. Previous noninvasive measurements of MOCR in humans focused primarily on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked at low sound levels. Interpreting MOCR effects on OAEs at higher levels is complicated by the possibility of the middle-ear muscle reflex and by components of OAEs arising from different locations along the length of the cochlear spiral. We overcame these issues by presenting click stimuli at a very slow rate and by time-frequency windowing the resulting click-evoked (CE)OAEs into short-latency (SL) and long-latency (LL) components. We characterized the effects of MOCR on CEOAE components using multiple measures to more comprehensively assess these effects throughout much of the dynamic range of hearing. These measures included CEOAE amplitude attenuation, equivalent input attenuation, phase, and slope of growth functions. Results show that MOCR effects are smaller on SL components than LL components, consistent with SL components being generated slightly basal of the characteristic frequency region. Amplitude attenuation measures showed the largest effects at the lowest stimulus levels, but slope change and equivalent input attenuation measures did not decrease at higher stimulus levels. These latter measures are less commonly reported and may provide insight into the variability in listening performance and noise susceptibility seen across individuals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 150 (6) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdem Eren ◽  
Ece Harman ◽  
Seçil Arslanoğlu ◽  
Kazım Önal

2017 ◽  
Vol 348 ◽  
pp. 134-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda ◽  
Almudena Eustaquio-Martín ◽  
Joshua S. Stohl ◽  
Robert D. Wolford ◽  
Reinhold Schatzer ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina E. Froud ◽  
Ann Chi Yan Wong ◽  
Jennie M. E. Cederholm ◽  
Matthias Klugmann ◽  
Shaun L. Sandow ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 1296-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Jacobs ◽  
Dawn Konrad-Martin ◽  
Garnett P. Mcmillan ◽  
Daniel McDermott ◽  
Stephen A. Fausti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document