scholarly journals Who hit the ball out? An egocentric temporal order bias

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. eaav5698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ty Y. Tang ◽  
Michael K. McBeath

Temporal order judgments can require integration of self-generated action events and external sensory information. We examined whether conscious experience is biased to perceive one’s own action events to occur before simultaneous external events, such as deciding whether you or your opponent last touched a basketball heading out of bounds. Participants made temporal order judgments comparing their own touch to another participant’s touch, a mechanical touch, or an auditory click. In all three manipulations, we find a robust bias to perceive self-generated action events to occur about 50 ms before external sensory events. We denote this bias to perceive self-actions earlier as the “egocentric temporal order” bias. Thus, if two players hit a ball nearly simultaneously, then both will likely have different subjective experiences of who touched last, leading to arguments.

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Babkoff ◽  
Elisheva Ben-Artzi ◽  
Leah Fostick

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent van de Ven ◽  
Moritz Jaeckels ◽  
Peter De Weerd

We tend to mentally segment a series of events according to perceptual contextual changes, such that items from a shared context are more strongly associated in memory than items from different contexts. It is also known that temporal context provides a scaffold to structure experiences in memory, but its role in event segmentation has not been investigated. We adapted a previous paradigm, which was used to investigate event segmentation using visual contexts, to study the effects of changes in temporal contexts on event segmentation in associative memory. We presented lists of items in which the inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged across lists between 0.5 and 4 s in 0.5 s steps. After each set of six lists, participants judged which one of two test items were shown first (temporal order judgment) for items that were either drawn from the same list or from consecutive lists. Further, participants judged from memory whether the ISI associated to an item lasted longer than a standard interval (2.25s) that was not previously shown. Results showed faster responses for temporal order judgments when items were drawn from the same context, as opposed to items drawn from different contexts. Further, we found that participants were well able to provide temporal duration judgments based on recalled durations. Finally, we found temporal acuity, as estimated by psychometric curve fitting parameters of the recalled durations, correlated inversely with within-list temporal order judgments. These findings show that changes in temporal context support event segmentation in associative memory.


Author(s):  
Scott A. Love ◽  
Karin Petrini ◽  
Cyril R. Pernet ◽  
Marianne Latinus ◽  
Frank E. Pollick

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e54798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Love ◽  
Karin Petrini ◽  
Adam Cheng ◽  
Frank E. Pollick

2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Craig ◽  
Thomas A. Busey

Cortex ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Rorden ◽  
Dongyun Li ◽  
Hans-Otto Karnath

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110394
Author(s):  
Diana B. Galarraga ◽  
Jay Pratt ◽  
Brett A. Cochrane

The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. (2007) using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention.


Author(s):  
Brian Rogers

Perception is one of the best understood topics in psychology and yet there is still no universal agreement as to how we should understand the purpose or objective of perceptual processes. Should it be to explain how we see, hear, smell, taste, and touch—our subjective experiences—or should it be to explain how sensory information guides and controls action? ‘The future’ considers to what extent our perceptual processes are cognitively penetrable, that is, affected by higher-level processes of attention, expectations, emotions, and knowledge. It also explains the important consequences of ecological validity for the kinds of experiments we use to study perception.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document