Endangered Species Act Targeted

Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 309 (5743) ◽  
pp. 1975c-1975c
Author(s):  
E. Stokstad
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Fitzgerald ◽  
David R. Smith ◽  
David C. Culver ◽  
Daniel Feller ◽  
Daniel W. Fong ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 215 (4537) ◽  
pp. 1212-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. HOLDEN

Science ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 269 (5232) ◽  
pp. 1803-1804
Author(s):  
Paul F. Torrence

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Czech ◽  
Rena Borkhataria

Species conservation via the Endangered Species Act is highly politicized, yet few data have been gathered to illustrate the relationship of political party affiliation to species conservation perspectives. We conducted a nationwide public opinion survey and found that Democrats value species conservation more highly than do Republicans, and that Democrats are also more strongly supportive of the Endangered Species Act. Republicans place higher value on property rights than do Democrats, but members of both parties value economic growth as highly as wildlife conservation. The results imply that the Democratic propensity to value species conservation reflects a biocentric perspective that does not bode well for practical conservation efforts. Species conservation will depend upon the success of academicians and progressive political leaders in educating students and members of all parties about the fundamental conflict between economic growth and wildlife conservation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document