Recent Books in Mathematics: Algebraic Invariants . By Leonard Eugene Dickson. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1914. Pp. 100. $1.25.; A Treatise on the Theory of Invariants . By Oliver E. Glenn. Boston, Ginn and Company, 1915. Pp. 245.; Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers . By Georg Cantor. Translated and Provided with an Introduction and Notes by Philip E. B. Jourdain. Chicago and London, The Open Court Publishing Company, 1915. Pp. 211. $1.25.; Problems in the Calculus. With Formulas and Suggestions . By David D. Leib. Boston and New York, Ginn and Company, 1915. Pp. 224.; Diophantine Analysis . By Robert D. Carmichael. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1915. Pp. 118.; Historical Introduction to Mathematical Literature . By G. A. Miller. New York, The Macmillan Company, 1916. Pp. 295.

Science ◽  
1916 ◽  
Vol 44 (1123) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Cassius J. Keyser

Reviews - A. E. Heath. Preface. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 7–8. - R. Rhees. Note in editing. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 9–43. - George Boole. The mathematical analysis of logic, being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning. A reprint of 191. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 45–119. - George Boole. Later notes (to the foregoing). Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 119–124. (Taken from manuscript in the Library of the Royal Society.) - George Boole. The calculus of logic. A reprint of 192. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 125–140. - George Boole. Sketch of a theory and method of probabilities founded upon the calculus of logic. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 141–166. (From manuscripts in the Royal Society Library, probably before 1851.) - George Boole. Of propositions numerically definite. A reprint of 194. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 167–186. - George Boole. The claims of science, especially as founded in its relation to human nature. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 187–210. (Lecture published in London, 1851.) - George Boole. Logic and reasoning. Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 211–229. (From Royal Society manuscripts, after 1855.) - George Boole. Extracts from a paper entitled “On the mathematical theory of logic and on the philosophical interpretation of its methods and processes.”Studies in logic and probability, by George Boole, Watts & Co., London1952, and the Open Court Publishing Company, LaSalle, Illinois, 1952, pp. 230–246. (From Royal Society manuscripts, later than 1855.)

1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dummett

1921 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 9-20
Author(s):  
George A. Gibson

In his recent book A History of the Conceptions of Limits and Fluxions in Great Britain from Neuton to Woodhouse (Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company, 1919), as well as in a series of articles in the American Mathematical Monthly for 1915 on The History of Zeno's Arguments on Motion, Mr Cajori discusses certain aspects of the conception of a limit, and treats in considerable detail the controversy between Jurin and Robins that arose out of the publication of Berkeley's Analyst. I gave an account of the controversy in a paper that appears in Volume XVII. of our Proceedings, and as Mr Cajori's estimate of the respective merits of the contributions by Jurin and Robins differs greatly from mine, and as the conception of a limit is fundamental in modern mathematics I venture to draw the attention of the Society to the matter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document