Regulating forensic genetic genealogy

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 373 (6562) ◽  
pp. 1444-1446
Author(s):  
Natalie Ram ◽  
Erin E. Murphy ◽  
Sonia M. Suter
2020 ◽  
Vol 316 ◽  
pp. 110543
Author(s):  
Nathan Scudder ◽  
Runa Daniel ◽  
Jennifer Raymond ◽  
Alison Sears

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 512-514
Author(s):  
Nathan Scudder ◽  
James Robertson ◽  
Sally F. Kelty ◽  
Simon J. Walsh ◽  
Dennis McNevin

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-168
Author(s):  
Aditi Mishra ◽  
Shivani Dixit ◽  
Sumit Kumar Choudhary ◽  
Harsh Sharma ◽  
Pankaj Shrivastava

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e35-e36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Hee Kim ◽  
Seung Beom Hong ◽  
Kyoung Don Kwak ◽  
Eun Jung Lee ◽  
Jong Jin Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1037969X2110072
Author(s):  
Rhanee Rego ◽  
John Anderson

Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) has opened up new frontiers in the search for the perpetrators of serious crimes. The pool of data held by consumer DNA databases has enabled law enforcement agencies to undertake database matching to find biological relatives of an unknown perpetrator. This relatively new forensic practice is not, however, without concerns when benchmarked against established norms of investigative practice and criminal procedure. The critical questions emerge: how should IGG be used and in what circumstances? In this article, we contend that the current laws in Australia are not capable of regulating IGG appropriately and legislative reform is required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. e1-e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Rapone ◽  
Eugenia D’Atanasio ◽  
Alessandro Agostino ◽  
Martina Mariano ◽  
Maria Teresa Papaluca ◽  
...  

PLoS Biology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e2006906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christi J. Guerrini ◽  
Jill O. Robinson ◽  
Devan Petersen ◽  
Amy L. McGuire
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document